Contemporary western understandings of 'childhood' reflect (adult) cultural projections of children as (sexually) innocent, vulnerable beings. In this paper, I examine how projections of children and their 'sexual culture' are maintained and reproduced through child sexual abuse therapy in North America. I argue that such specious frameworks pose conceptual problems for exploring how children interpret their sexual experiences. Seeing that research involving direct contact with children has been rendered practically impossible, the ability to theoretically 'step outside' narrow conceptual frameworks is critical. In providing avenues to denaturalize age categories, social constructionism and post-structuralism have made breakthroughs in this regard; yet both are limited in their ability to offer solutions to the said conceptual impasse. I focus the remainder of my paper on illustrating the merits and shortcomings of constructionism and post-structuralism as analytical tools. I conclude with some conjectures about the uses of each perspective both in research on children and in therapy.

Michel Dorais' (2009) Don't tell:The sexual abuse of boys showcases the testimonials of 30 males who experienced sexual abuse in their youth. Though insightful in its challenge to normative readings of child sexual abuse (CSA), Dorais' compilation remains limiting in that victims' experiences are continually (re)framed through the medicalized lenses of trauma and pathology, while young victims are represented as having been developmentally "damaged" as a result of their experiences. Using a postructural/discursive approach to ground my analyses, I argue that Dorais' work parallels dominant CSA discourses, which pathologize already heavily stigmatized individuals, efface counter-narratives, essentialize trauma as an inherent and immovable attribute, and constrain the ability of former victims to transcend their victimization. This maintains these victims "in" trauma through the discourse of the trauma "in" them. Finally, I offer an alternative reading of the claims put forward by Dorais and his research participants to highlight young people's own positions of power contra adult sexual aggressors and thereby draw out youth resistance. I do so in an effort to sketch out the beginnings of a framework that does more than pay lip service to the recognition of young people's agency.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract