“…Theorem 1, whose proof is given at the end of Section 2, is most closely related to the findings of [8,7,15] give that, when either T 1 has the distribution of the integrated tail of T 2 with (implicitly) ET 2 P p0, 8q, or else when T 1 has the same distribution as T 2 , PpT 2 ă 8q " 1 and T 2 is non-arithmetic (respectively, when Pp0 ă T 1 q " 1 and (as implicitly assumed in the proof; not all the assumptions appear to be given explicitly) PpT 1 " 8q ă 1; when Pp0 ă T 1 , 0 ă T 2 q " 1 and PpT 1 ă ǫq ą 0 for all ǫ ą 0), then covpN 0 t , N 1 t q " 0 for all t P p0, 8q implies N " HPPpθq for some θ P p0, 8q. (Strictly speaking the quoted result of [8] is false.…”