“…There are some limitations to this classical approach such as the requirement of elevated reaction temperatures in the case of less reactive amines, lower reactivity for the sterically crowded amines/epoxides and poor regioselectivity of the epoxide ring opening. To overcome these problems, several activators and promoters have been tried and reported in the literature, including metal salts [5][6][7], metal amides [8,9], metal alkoxides [10,11], metal triflates [12][13][14], alumina [15], microwave assisted montmorillonite clay [16], ionic liquids [17], heteropolyacids [18], amberlist-15 [19], thiourea [20], trifluoroethanol [21], silica [22], zeolites [23], organobismuth triflate complex [24], sulphated zirconia and SZ/MCM-41 [25]. However, these methods suffer from one or more disadvantages such as long reaction times [26], elevated temperatures [4,27], high pressure [22a, 28], moderate yields [18], use of air and moisture sensitive catalysts, requirement of stoichiometric amounts of catalyst, and problems in the recovery of the catalysts [26].…”