2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-015-3877-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third-Nearest-Neighbors Tight-Binding Description of Optical Response of Carbon Nanotubes: Effects of Chirality and Diameter

Abstract: We have applied a third nearest-neighbor tight binding model to investigate the optical properties of CNTs in terms of radius, chirality and magnetic field. The optical spectrum of CNTs depends strongly on the radius and chirality in the infrared region in contrast to the middle energy region. The dependence of E 22 /E 11 on the radius and chirality from optical peak positions and band structure is similar. In the infrared region, by applying the magnetic field, the optical peak splitting rates show well-expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reasonable because the energy of the second valence band of semiconducting SWCNTs strongly depends on the nanotube diameter. [ 41,58 ] The calculation results for metallic SWCNTs with different average diameters show a similar dependence of ISBP energy and intensity on nanotube diameter, supporting the experimental results (Figure S12, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is reasonable because the energy of the second valence band of semiconducting SWCNTs strongly depends on the nanotube diameter. [ 41,58 ] The calculation results for metallic SWCNTs with different average diameters show a similar dependence of ISBP energy and intensity on nanotube diameter, supporting the experimental results (Figure S12, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In their work, the use of mixed nanotube samples containing metallic and semiconducting SWCNTs with a wide diameter distribution renders unambiguous assessment of the influence of the diameter and electronic types of SWCNTs on their ISBPs difficult. It is well known that there is a significant difference in excitonic band structure [ 38–41 ] and selection rules [ 42 ] on allowed intersubband transitions between semiconducting and metallic SWCNTs. Therefore, ISBP‐derived excitations are reasonably expected to be different for semiconducting and metallic SWCNTs, but a detailed study has not been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the energy band structure of carbon nanotubes, we adopt the zone-folding approximation of graphene with long-range atomic interactions up to the third nearest-neighbor transfer integrals, or the socalled third nearest-neighbor tight-binding (3rd NNTB) model [43,44]. Although this approach does not include the curvature effect, the resulting band structure is sufficiently accurate for SWNTs with diameter larger than 1 nm [45].…”
Section: A Defining Plasmons From Dielectric Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clarity of the picture, we plot the van Hove singularity transitions with corresponding Fermi level shift in the density of states (DOS) of typical 2 nm in diameter semiconducting and metallic nanotubes (Figure f) calculated within the third-nearest-neighbor tight-binding mode . While the doping time and corresponding amount of dopant (Figure S9) increase, the van Hove singularity transitions disappear one by one (Figure a,f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%