2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.01565
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third order fiducial predictions for Drell-Yan at the LHC

X. Chen,
T. Gehrmann,
E. W. N. Glover
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our calculation is based on the G µ scheme with the following EW parameters: M Z = 91.1876 GeV, Γ Z = 2.4952 GeV, G F = 1.1663787 × 10 −5 GeV −2 [53], and a diagonal CKM ma- Ratio to NNLO Ratio to NNLO While the NLO and NNLO scale variation bands overlap, the N 3 LO prediction is found to be non-overlapping with the previous order within the respective scale uncertainties. This feature at N 3 LO has already been observed for the total cross sections for neutral current [56,57] and charged-current [13] Drell-Yan production and for the neutral-current Drell-Yan rapidity distribution [33] and fiducial cross sections [58]. The relative size of scale variation remains comparable at NNLO and N 3 LO at about ±1% for central rapidity and slightly increasing at large rapidity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our calculation is based on the G µ scheme with the following EW parameters: M Z = 91.1876 GeV, Γ Z = 2.4952 GeV, G F = 1.1663787 × 10 −5 GeV −2 [53], and a diagonal CKM ma- Ratio to NNLO Ratio to NNLO While the NLO and NNLO scale variation bands overlap, the N 3 LO prediction is found to be non-overlapping with the previous order within the respective scale uncertainties. This feature at N 3 LO has already been observed for the total cross sections for neutral current [56,57] and charged-current [13] Drell-Yan production and for the neutral-current Drell-Yan rapidity distribution [33] and fiducial cross sections [58]. The relative size of scale variation remains comparable at NNLO and N 3 LO at about ±1% for central rapidity and slightly increasing at large rapidity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…At this perturbative order, both inclusive and fully-differential results are available [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Very recently, N 3 LO QCD corrections to DY processes were calculated [24][25][26][27][28][29] and found to be close to a percent, motivating their inclusion at this level of precision. In addition to QCD corrections, electroweak (EW) contributions also need to be accounted for to achieve percent-level precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the calculation of some two-loop amplitudes that are currently not available, as well as reaching the level of automation, in terms of overall assembly and ease of use, that has already been achieved at NLO. For a few select processes, N 3 LO precision has been achieved [76][77][78]; an appraisal of the prospects for reaching this level of precision more broadly is given in Ref. [79].…”
Section: Fixed-order Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%