2017
DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1342695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Third person singular -s in typical development and specific language impairment: Input and neighbourhood density

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine factors promoting the use of third person singular -s by 23 children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 21 children with typical development (TD). Relative proportions of third person singular -s forms in the input (input proportion) were calculated for 25 verbs based on data from an American English corpus of child-directed speech. Neighbourhood density values were also collected for these verbs. With previously collected probes of third person singular -s use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that the addition of a defaulting mechanism allows MOSAIC to simulate the very high rate of OI errors in early child English without affecting the model's previously good fit to the data on Dutch, German, and Spanish. These findings are consistent with the idea that at least some apparent OI errors in English reflect a process of defaulting to the most frequent form of the verb (Räsänen et al, 2014;Kueser et al, 2018), and suggest that the very high rate of OI errors in English reflects the fact that, in English, but not in the other languages, defaulting tends to result in the same kind of errors as the learning of infinitives directly from the input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that the addition of a defaulting mechanism allows MOSAIC to simulate the very high rate of OI errors in early child English without affecting the model's previously good fit to the data on Dutch, German, and Spanish. These findings are consistent with the idea that at least some apparent OI errors in English reflect a process of defaulting to the most frequent form of the verb (Räsänen et al, 2014;Kueser et al, 2018), and suggest that the very high rate of OI errors in English reflects the fact that, in English, but not in the other languages, defaulting tends to result in the same kind of errors as the learning of infinitives directly from the input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, the pattern of verb-marking deficit in DLD varies across languages. Thus, as we have already seen, English-speaking children with DLD tend to produce OI/bare stem errors at higher rates than language-matched controls, even at high MLUs (Kueser et al, 2018;Rice, Wexler, & Cleave, 1995;Rice, Wexler, & Hershberger, 1998). However, this effect appears to be specific to English.…”
Section: The Dual-factor Modelsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for defaulting effects in English DLD is provided by Kueser, Leonard, and Deevy (2017), who replicate the findings of Räsänen et al, but find that children with DLD produce more bare forms than typically developing children, thus raising the possibility that defaulting effects are stronger in children with DLD. Bedore and Leonard (2001) find that Spanish children with DLD do produce more errors than age‐matched (but not MLU‐matched) controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…34 Children with DLD are also affected by the same phonological variable but show the opposite pattern. Specifically, children with DLD produce the third person singular morpheme more accurately in verbs that are more phonologically distinct from other words in the language, both on elicited probes 35 and in the context of treatment. 36 Children with DLD are also more accurate in their production of regular past tense when the verbs to be inflected are composed of common sound sequences.…”
Section: Relevant Linguistics Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 94%