2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01507.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thirty‐two single nucleotide polymorphism markers for high‐throughput genotyping of sockeye salmon

Abstract: We characterize 32 single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping assays for resolving genotypic variation in sockeye salmon Oncorhynchus nerka in the Pacific Rim. These assays are based on the 5′ ′ ′ ′ -nuclease reaction and thus facilitate high-throughput genotyping with minimal optimization time. Minor allele frequency differences (∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ q) among collections were between 4.7% and 97.9%, resulting in per locus F ST estimates of 0.02-0.71 with an average of 0.22.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Genotypes were obtained using the Fluidigm IFC thermal cyclers and the Fluidigm BioMark instrument, as detailed in Seeb et al (2009). All individuals were genotyped at 42 nuclear and 3 mitochondrial SNP loci (Table 2; Smith et al 2005;Elfstrom et al 2006;Habicht et al 2010). Genotypes were imported and organized in the International Program for Salmon Ecological Genetics Progeny database (Progeny Software, South Bend, Indiana).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypes were obtained using the Fluidigm IFC thermal cyclers and the Fluidigm BioMark instrument, as detailed in Seeb et al (2009). All individuals were genotyped at 42 nuclear and 3 mitochondrial SNP loci (Table 2; Smith et al 2005;Elfstrom et al 2006;Habicht et al 2010). Genotypes were imported and organized in the International Program for Salmon Ecological Genetics Progeny database (Progeny Software, South Bend, Indiana).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All individuals were genotyped for 127 previously determined EST-based SNPs [64,69-71] following procedures for 5’ nuclease assays as described in Seeb et al [72]. Genotype calling was carried out using the SDS 2.3 software (Life Technologies, Carlsbad California) or the BioMark 3.0.2 software (Fluidigm, South San Francisco, California).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to SNP discovery in non-model organisms is a reliable method that can be employed in most taxa (Aitken et al 2004;Lyons et al 1997;Palumbi 1996). The EPIC method works best when DNA sequence data are available for protein-coding regions of genes from organisms closely related to the focal species (for recent examples see Cappuccio et al 2006;Elfstrom et al 2006;Morin et al 2007; for a bioinformatics pipeline applicable to plants see Fredslund et al 2006). There are several variants on the EPIC approach, including amplification of exonic rather than intronic sequence (Elfstrom et al 2007;Ryynanen and Primmer 2004).…”
Section: Epic and Related Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%