This stillness, this lack of incident: making conflict visible in West Papua

Philpott, Simon

doi:10.1080/14672715.2018.1445537

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So it becomes very natural if, in the end, the issue of independent Papua becomes an international issue (Philpott, 2018).…”

Section: Results Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benny Wenda’s Political Propaganda about the Free Papua Issue Through Twitter

Zahidi¹

2023

jip

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to explain the political propaganda of the free Papua issue spread by Benny Wenda via his Twitter account. This study used a qualitative approach to analyze Benny Wenda's Twitter account. The NVivo 12 Plus software was used in this study because it can process Benny Wenda's Twitter data. This research discovered Benny Wenda's Twitter propaganda of the free Papua issue divided into 11 important topics, namely "Occupation", "media", "independence", "colonial", "today", "support", "rights", "prisoners", "Political prisoners", "people" and "Papuan". The 11 topics were further broken down into several important topics related to the issue of an independent Papua. From the analysis of Benny Wenda's Twitter account, it was also found that support for the Papuan independence movement was spread in several regions, including North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. Despite this massive support, the UN has not recognized this movement, as stated by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres that Papua is part of Indonesian territory through uti possideti iuris, the NY Agreement of 1962, the Act of Free Choice of 1969, and UNGA resolution 2504 (XXIV) of 1969.

show abstract

“…So it becomes very natural if, in the end, the issue of independent Papua becomes an international issue (Philpott, 2018).…”

Section: Results Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benny Wenda’s Political Propaganda about the Free Papua Issue Through Twitter

Zahidi¹

2023

jip

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While the level and rate of violence against West Papuans by the Indonesian state's security services are hotly contested, the fact that this violence has happened and continues is not. The explanations for the use of this violence are also highly divergent: on the one hand, these are acts of terror and suppression done to destroy a group; on the other, they are legitimate measures taken by the Indonesian state to ensure their territorial integrity (see Philpott, 2018;Hernawan, 2018).…”

Section: Not-naming Genocide: West Papuamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Darroch, Anderson and others do draw attention to some of the more problematic elements within those activist campaigns; for a more nuanced discussion, see Philpott (2018). 4) For a critique of these debates, see, for example, Powell (2007) and Short (2016) and, for more on genocide as a process, rather than as a (somewhat) discrete physical event, see Rosenberg (2012).…”

Section: The Inefficacy Of Naming Genocidementioning

confidence: 99%

“…See Anderson (2015) and International Crisis Group (2006). 10) See Philpott (2018). In 2013, a group of academics, activists and survivors held a peoples' tribunal in Sydney, to make a legal case regarding the mass murder, torture, sexual violence, and other gross violations committed by Indonesian security forces personnel as part of crimes against humanity in the port town of Biak in July 1998, see Edwards (2017).…”

Section: The Inefficacy Of Naming Genocidementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Inefficacy of Naming Genocide in Contemporary Southeast Asia

Pohlman¹

2020

Hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines two cases of ongoing persecution in Southeast Asia and the problems of naming either genocide. Specifically, I discuss the politics of naming the decades’ long persecution of the Rohingya in Burma and West Papuans genocide. Both cases highlight some critical points of contention within the field of genocide studies which revolve around competing conceptions of how and what genocides destroy. Often separated into liberal and post-liberal camps, or those which conceive of genocide as a crime or as a process, these competing views create deep divisions over what cases of mass violence can be named genocide, or not. I take up some of these highly politicized and moralistic debates around the naming of genocide in light of these two contemporary Southeast Asian cases; that of the Rohingya which arguably has been recognised as a case of genocide since the latest wave of violence in 2017; and the case of West Papua, which remains very much at the fringes of genocide studies. I also draw on the work of a range of scholars who question the “effectivity” of naming genocide. I argue that, in these two contemporary Southeast Asian cases, naming (Rohingya) and not-naming (West Papua) cases of ongoing persecution genocide has had little effect whatsoever.

show abstract

“…Moreover, the average Indonesian school year is eight years, with the expected school year at 12.9 years. The Human Development Index (HDI) data cannot be separated from the national development that the Indonesian government has carried out on an ongoing basis (Caraka & Yasin, 2017;Philpott, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of the performance accountability system for government agencies (SAKIP) in realizing good governance at the Kediri city health office

Rizal

Askafi

Supriyono

2021

ijbem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the implementation of SAKIP at the Kediri City Health Office, there were obstacles in making reports and implementing policies. This study used a qualitative descriptive method with a purposive sampling method. The result is a determinant of decision or policy-making by looking at the existing problems to produce an accurate strategy to improve performance. The priority scale of the program that is carried out then becomes very important in the sustainability of SAKIP in the coming year. This study is based on the results or performance orientation shown in the Government Agency Performance Report (LKjIP) and the implementation of SAKIP itself. The purpose of this research is to identify problems and solutions to problems faced in governance. Agency Performance Accountability System.

show abstract

This stillness, this lack of incident: making conflict visible in West Papua

Abstract: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence Newcastle University ePrints -eprint.ncl.ac.uk

Cited by 9 publications

References 20 publications

Benny Wenda’s Political Propaganda about the Free Papua Issue Through Twitter

Benny Wenda’s Political Propaganda about the Free Papua Issue Through Twitter

The Inefficacy of Naming Genocide in Contemporary Southeast Asia

Implementation of the performance accountability system for government agencies (SAKIP) in realizing good governance at the Kediri city health office

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About