“…Previous studies have successfully linked chemical zoning of Ce or Y in metamorphic monazite to mineral reactions involving garnet, apatite, xenotime and melt (Corrie & Kohn, 2008; Dumond et al, 2015; Kohn & Malloy, 2004; Pyle & Spear, 1999, 2003; Rubatto et al, 2006; Smith & Barreiro, 1990; Wing et al, 2003). However, to date, studies that have focused on Th behaviour in particular are few (Bea & Montero, 1999; Bingen et al, 1996; Skrzypek et al, 2018; Watt, 1995; Williams et al, 2018) and studies reporting Th zoning in monazite have produced seemingly contradictory results (e.g., decreasing Th from core to rim; Kohn & Malloy, 2004; Th‐in‐monazite is constant or increases with metamorphic grade; Skrzypek et al, 2018; Williams et al, 2018). Recent work by Williams et al (2018) and Skrzypek et al (2018), both on low pressure terranes, identified monazite chemical zones in prograde metamorphic sequences.…”