2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.09.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thoron versus radon: measurement and dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of D E was launched by the ICRP32 to take into account the biological effects of different types of ionizing radiation by a single index. The exposure from alpha particles of radon and its decay products in terms of effective dose can be determined using the following relation, Equation (2), described by the ICRP33 and UNSCEAR:10 where, C R is the average radon concentration (Bq m −3 ), F is the equilibrium factor equal to 0.4 indoors and 0.6 outdoors have been widely accepted for most of the radon measurements,10 , 12 O is the fraction of time spent in houses: for indoor and outdoor the occupancy factor was 0.7 and 0.3, respectively, both for the male and female based on data obtained from the inhabitants of the understudy mud houses, T is the number of the hours per year, which is equal to 8,760 h y −1 , and F D is the concentration to dose rate conversion factor, which has been estimated to be 9 nGy h −1 per Bq m −3 10 , 34 , 35…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of D E was launched by the ICRP32 to take into account the biological effects of different types of ionizing radiation by a single index. The exposure from alpha particles of radon and its decay products in terms of effective dose can be determined using the following relation, Equation (2), described by the ICRP33 and UNSCEAR:10 where, C R is the average radon concentration (Bq m −3 ), F is the equilibrium factor equal to 0.4 indoors and 0.6 outdoors have been widely accepted for most of the radon measurements,10 , 12 O is the fraction of time spent in houses: for indoor and outdoor the occupancy factor was 0.7 and 0.3, respectively, both for the male and female based on data obtained from the inhabitants of the understudy mud houses, T is the number of the hours per year, which is equal to 8,760 h y −1 , and F D is the concentration to dose rate conversion factor, which has been estimated to be 9 nGy h −1 per Bq m −3 10 , 34 , 35…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, C R is the average radon concentration (Bq m À3 ), F is the equilibrium factor equal to 0.4 indoors and 0.6 outdoors have been widely accepted for most of the radon measurements, 10,12 O is the fraction of time spent in houses: for indoor and outdoor the occupancy factor was 0.7 and 0.3, respectively, both for the male and female based on data obtained from the inhabitants of the understudy mud houses, T is the number of the hours per year, which is equal to 8,760 h y À1 , and F D is the concentration to dose rate conversion factor, which has been estimated to be 9 nGy h À1 per Bq m À3 . 10,34,35 The ELCR due to average radon concentration in mud houses was determined using the following relation, Equation (3), as per methodology described by the EPA 21 and adopted by the UNSCEAR: 10…”
Section: Assessment Of Radon Hazardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical methods have been historically used to measure radon and thoron activities: Lucas cells, alpha track films, scintillation method and ionization chamber. Currently it is possible to measure 222 Rn and 220 Rn in high frequency sampling devices based on electrostatic techniques (one measurement per hour or less) (LABRECQUE, 2002;HARLEY et al, 2005) in which an electrostatic potential gradient sweeps the products derived from the decay of the 220 Rn and 222 Rn in the chamber. The 220 Rn and 222 Rn activities are determined by high-resolution alpha spectroscopy of the deposited decay products.…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the significance of thoron has been recognized and interest on the measurement of the indoor thoron concentration is growing (Dwivedi et al, 2005;Pennington, 2006;Harley et al, 2005;Tokonami, 2005;Yonehara et al, 2005). In some cases, when thoron exhalation is high, exposure to thoron may be even higher than exposure to radon .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%