Threat and fear in parliamentary debates in Britain, Germany and Italy

Bayley, Paul; Bevitori, Cinzia; Zoni, Elisabetta

doi:10.1075/dapsac.10.06bay

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6 Each subcorpus can be downloaded through the repository orlike the Finnish corpusqueried online through Korp. The corpus was tokenised, lemmatised, MSD-tagged (including additional markup in relation to semantic features, lemgrams and compounding) with Sparv, which is the Språkbanken's corpus annotation pipeline infrastructure (Borin et al, 2016). All the subcorpora are available under CC-BY.…”

Section: Presentation Of the Clarin Parliamentary Corporamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to its unique content, structure and language, records of parliamentary sessions have always been a quintessential resource for a wide range of research questions from a number of disciplines in Digital Humanities and Social Sciences, such as Political Science (van Dijk 2010), Sociology (Cheng 2015), History (Pančur and Šorn 2016), Discourse Analysis (Hirst et al 2014), Sociolinguistics (Rheault et al 2015) as well as Multilinguality (Bayley et al 2004). The good availability of parliamentary data in digitized form and granted access rights to public information in the EU countries have motivated a number of national as well as international initiatives to compile, process and analyse parliamentary corpora.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2022

Simov¹,

Eskevich²

2023

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

i abstracts. Each submission was reviewed by at least three reviewers, all of whom scientists with rich experience and significant achievements in Language Technology and/or Digital Humanities. 24 submissions were accepted as a result of the two reviewing and correction rounds: 13 for oral presentations, the remaining ones as posters. The selected contributions were published online in the Book of Abstracts: https://www.clarin.eu/content/abstracts-overview-clarin-annual-conference-2017.After the conference, the authors of all accepted presentations were invited to prepare significantly expanded versions of their abstracts as full paper proposals. The authors were strongly encouraged to take into account the outcome of the discussion of their presentations during the conference, as well as their further work performed after conference. 12 papers were submitted and reviewed by the Program Committee. Each paper was reviewed by two reviewers, during two iterations. The process was completed by a final review with the aim to check if all the requested changes had been introduced. On the basis of the improved versions sent after the second reviewing iteration, all 12 papers were accepted and included in this volume.The accepted papers represent an overview of the most important topics discussed during the conference. The first two papers (Nicolas et al.) and (Parisse, et al.) report on the process of the formation of national consortia and their initial development.Next, Durco et al. revisit an important problem of constructing mapping between metadata formats from the point of view of building links between the CLARIN CMDI metadata standard and the metadata system in the PARTHENOS project. One of the goals of this project is to build a platform linking several major research infrastructures related to the area of SS&H. Metadata mapping is also close to a very challenging issue of the curation of metadata content.Zinn presents further development of the Switchboard systems for effortless and automated linking of resources with language tools, as well as processing chains on the basis of resources content. A new mechanism of directly linking EUDAT's B2DROP cloud service to Switchboard is the main focus of the paper.The next papers, namely of Sugimoto and Monachini et al., are about a problem of great importance for CLARIN (and every research infrastructure), i.e. studying and discovering users' needs. Sugimoto analyses users' behaviours through the observation of their activities in the already existing infrastructure and its systems. Monachini et al. report on an interesting surveybased study among the researchers in Classics Studies on the actual and intended use of digital methods. The results and conclusions are also illustrated by a mock-up prototype of a future system.The papers of Fišer & Lenardič and Borin et al. are devoted to the enrichment of language resources in CLARIN on the basis of the already existing resources in a way focused on the identified users' needs. Fišer & Lenardič report on the results of a...

show abstract

Section: Presentation Of the Clarin Parliamentary Corporamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2022

Simov¹,

Eskevich²

2023

Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several research articles have dealt with the nature of parliamentary discourse in general (Bayley, 2004; Bianchini, 2008; Ilie, 2003c, 2006). In a number of articles, authors have focused on specific parliamentary speeches (Ensink, 1997; Fløttum and Stenvoll, 2009; Frumuselu and Ilie, 2010; Sauer, 1997; Van Dijk, 2002, 2005), whereas others have written on the use of key words (Bayley and San Vincente, 2004; Bayley et al, 2004; Ilie, 1999; Jose and Moore, 2007; Vasta, 2004) and phraseology (Elspass, 2002). The methodology of corpus linguistics has been employed in the research of similar topics by Bara et al (2007) and Cucchi (2007), as well as by Bijeikiené and Utka (2007), who wrote on gender equality in parliament.…”

Section: Previous Research On Parliamentary Discoursementioning

confidence: 99%

Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro

Vuković

2012

Discourse & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pronominal choice in political talk reflects hidden ideologies, which is why it has been a muchstudied phenomenon in the discourse analytic research of politics in western democracies. However, similar topics remain largely unexplored in eastern and transition countries. With this in mind, the aim of the present article is to explore the use of subject pronouns and the person of the verb in the Parliament of Montenegro. The budget debate conducted in December 2009 was chosen for the corpus and was later subdivided into 10-minute pre-prepared 'Speeches' and three-minute 'Comments', which represent spontaneous responses. The two subcorpora were then compared with respect to person deixis. The results of the study point to the fact that, when given the chance to carefully plan their talk in advance, the MPs used the first-person plural and positive self-campaign much more often. On the other hand, in their spontaneous talk, the MPs more often referred to themselves as individuals and resorted more readily to addressing others using negative presentation strategies. Their prepared talk was therefore crafted and tailored for political effect through the use of consciously employed persuasive strategies that relate to the choice of person. It is suggested that the comparison of pre-scripted and unscripted political talk can reveal underlying political ideologies.

show abstract

Anti-racist Discourse on Muslims in the Australian Parliament

Cheng

2017

Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Threat and fear in parliamentary debates in Britain, Germany and Italy

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2022

Selected papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2022

Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro

Anti-racist Discourse on Muslims in the Australian Parliament

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About