2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threat, Anti-Western Hostility and Violence among European Muslims: The Mediating Role of Acculturation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intergroup threats have been linked to several negative intergroup outcomes-cognitive, emotional, and behavioral (Riek et al, 2006;Stephan et al, 2009). For example, both realistic and symbolic threats have been linked to support for persecution of Muslim immigrants among non-Muslim Americans (Obaidi et al, 2018), and to support for violent behavioral intentions among British and Norwegian Muslims (Tahir et al, 2019). Besides behavioral outcomes, perceived threat also triggers various negative emotional responses to outgroups such as fear and anger (Cottrell & Neuberg, 2005) and even schadenfreude (i.e., pleasure in response to outgroup misfortune; Chang et al, 2016), as well as negative cognitive responses such as increased ingroup versus outgroup categorization and stereotyping (Chang et al, 2016;Riek et al, 2006).…”
Section: Integrated and Distinctiveness Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intergroup threats have been linked to several negative intergroup outcomes-cognitive, emotional, and behavioral (Riek et al, 2006;Stephan et al, 2009). For example, both realistic and symbolic threats have been linked to support for persecution of Muslim immigrants among non-Muslim Americans (Obaidi et al, 2018), and to support for violent behavioral intentions among British and Norwegian Muslims (Tahir et al, 2019). Besides behavioral outcomes, perceived threat also triggers various negative emotional responses to outgroups such as fear and anger (Cottrell & Neuberg, 2005) and even schadenfreude (i.e., pleasure in response to outgroup misfortune; Chang et al, 2016), as well as negative cognitive responses such as increased ingroup versus outgroup categorization and stereotyping (Chang et al, 2016;Riek et al, 2006).…”
Section: Integrated and Distinctiveness Threatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend future studies investigate other factors that might explain why assimilation was the only significant predictor of social inclusion, while integration did not reveal any significant results. One suggestion is to present Muslims’ cultural practices as a threat to Canadian cultural identity to examine the underlying mechanism for preferring social inclusion for assimilated Muslims (see e.g., Tahir et al, 2019 ). Moreover, even though Canadian Muslims are integrated into Canadian society ( McCoy et al, 2016 ), the perception is different among majority group members.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas many theories and models suggest that relative deprivation also plays a key role for extremism [28,29] 35,36]. In fact, Muslim individuals enrolled in higher education and high earners are sometimes more likely to support and sympathize with violent protest and acts of terrorism [37,38], and those born in the West tend to be more inclined to endorse violence than those born in conflict areas [20]. This suggests that, rather than actual deprivation, what matters in particular may be minority-group members' subjective experience of it.…”
Section: Relative Deprivation and Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%