Threat of grade retention, remedial education and student achievement: evidence from upper secondary schools in Italy

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes.You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. licence. www.econstor.eu We use a reform that was recently implemented in Italy to investigate the effects on academic achievement of more stringent requirements for the admission to the next grade at upper secondary school. We study how such effects are mediated by changes in family and school inputs, and in the student commitment to learn all school subjects including those usually considered as marginal components of the curriculum. Geographical discontinuities in the implementation of the reform allow us to set out the comparison of similar students undergoing alternative progression rules, and to shed light on whether, and to what extent, the reform has worked as a tool to improve short-term achievement gains. We document differential effects across curricular tracks, picturing at best -depending on the data employed -a marginal improvement for students in academic schools. We instead find sharp negative effects of the reform in technical and vocational schools, where the students enrolled come from less privileged backgrounds. These findings are accompanied by a substantial increase in the number of activities out of the normal school hours in technical and vocational schools, but not in academic schools. Also, we find that the reform has left unchanged the various family inputs that we consider, and that parents did not provide extra economic support to students facing an increased threat of grade retention. However, in contrast with the documented effects on achievement, we find that schools reacted to the additional administrative burdens and costs imposed by the reform by admitting more students to the next grade. We thus conclude that the reform has had a negative effect on motivation and engagement of the most struggling students, thus exacerbating existing inequalities. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E S IntroductionIncreasing concerns about the quality of education in Europe and the United States have lead in the recent years to the implementation of ...

Where Do You Come from, where Do You Go? Assessing Skills Gaps and Labour Market Outcomes of Young Adults with Different Immigration Backgrounds

“…Interestingly, having no shortage of math teachers seems to correlate strongly with better math performance in PISA for second-generation immigrants. It is also worth noting that the threat of grade retention seems to be negatively associated with firstgeneration immigrants' performance in both literacy and math in PISA, which confirms that such school accountability policies can exacerbate the achievement gap between academically disadvantaged students and other students (Battistin and Schizzerotto, 2019).…”

Effectiveness of grade retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…2), which were again screened by the first two authors independently. Finally, 84 studies (Afsa, 2011;Alet, Bonnal, & Favard, 2013;Allensworth, 2005;André, 2009;Andrew, 2014;Appelmans, 2016;Battistin & Schizzerotto, 2012Belot & Vandenberghe, 2014;Bhattacharya, 2008;Bietenbeck, 2014 Jacob & Lefgren, 2004, 2009Keslair, 2007;Klapproth et al, 2016;Koppensteiner, 2014 Hughes, 2012;Nunes, Balcão Reis, & Seabra, 2018;Okurut, 2018;Ou & Reynolds, 2010;Ozek, 2015;Park, Steiner, & Kaplan, 2018;Pereira & Reis, 2014;Peterson & Hughes, 2011;Roderick & Nagaoka, 2005;Schumann, 2012;Schwerdt et al, 2017;Troncin, 2005;Uysal, 2010;Vandecandelaere, Schmitt, Vanlaar, De Fraine, & Van Damme, 2016c;Vandecandelaere, Vanlaar, Goos, De Fraine, & Van Damme, 2011, 2013Vandecandelaere, Vansteelandt, De Fraine, & Van Damme, 2016a, 2016bWinters & Greene, 2012;Wu, West, & Hughes, 2008 covering 1328 single effects were included in our review (see Fig. 2).…”

An Intensive, School-Based Learning Camp Targeting Academic and Non-Cognitive Skills Evaluated in a Randomized Trial

“…They find positive effects on math and reading performance in the short and long run for grade 3 pupils but not for grade 6 pupils. Battistin and Schizzerotto (2019) exploit geographic variations in the implementation of mandatory summer courses for at-risk pupils in Italy. They find negative short term effects on academic performance (the marks given by teachers, final examination and a test based on the PISA tests) in vocational schools and no effects in academic schools.…”