2013
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threat‐related attentional bias in anorexia nervosa

Abstract: The results suggest that the AB in AN patients may be specific to eating disorder-relevant anxieties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative outcome for attention bias in AN differs from two prior studies that reported attention bias to angry faces using a Stroop task (Aspen et al, 2013), but it is consistent with a study using the dot probe task with social threat word stimuli (Dipl-psych et al, 2014). Relative to the dot probe, the Stroop task has been noted to have disadvantages, including that delays in response to threat stimuli may be due to increased attention as well as general delays in response to threat (Algom et al, 2004), and inability to assess allocation of spatial attention (MacLeod et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The negative outcome for attention bias in AN differs from two prior studies that reported attention bias to angry faces using a Stroop task (Aspen et al, 2013), but it is consistent with a study using the dot probe task with social threat word stimuli (Dipl-psych et al, 2014). Relative to the dot probe, the Stroop task has been noted to have disadvantages, including that delays in response to threat stimuli may be due to increased attention as well as general delays in response to threat (Algom et al, 2004), and inability to assess allocation of spatial attention (MacLeod et al, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Such compensatory processes may be at play in AN. Similar nullcorrelations between measures of anxiety and attentional bias to threat have previously been reported in AN (Schneier et al, 2016;Schober et al, 2014), underscoring the cross-study variability of findings. This could account for the partly discrepant findings from behavioral studies of attentional bias to threat in AN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, unlike some previous studies (Cardi et al, 2013;Telzer et al, 2008), and in contrast to our hypothesis, we did not detect a significant correlation between anxiety and attentional bias to threat. Similar nullcorrelations between measures of anxiety and attentional bias to threat have previously been reported in AN (Schneier et al, 2016;Schober et al, 2014), underscoring the cross-study variability of findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations