“…Some leaders in the field have endorsed the edTPA, arguing that it offers a more authentic evaluation of the sophisticated knowledge and skills demanded of teachers and that it will improve teacher preparation programs and help restore credibility to the teaching profession (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 2019; American Federation of Teachers, 2012; Darling‐Hammond & Hyler, 2013; Sato, 2014; Whittaker, Pecheone, & Stansbury, 2018). Simultaneously, others have questioned the reliability and validity of the assessment as a predictive measure of teacher quality (Gitomer et al, 2019; Hébert, 2017; Parkes & Powell, 2015), in part, due to its reliance on possibly decontextualized 15–20‐min video clips evaluated by a distant reviewer (Choppin & Meuwissen, 2017; Dover & Schultz, 2016) and the extensive amount of writing it requires (Au, 2013; Denton, 2018; Ledwell & Oyler, 2016). While candidates' performance on the edTPA has been positively associated with other common measures of teacher quality, such as GPA (Cash, Putman, Polly, & Byker, 2019; Evans, Kelly, Baldwin, & Arnold, 2016) and assessments of teachers' content knowledge (Goldhaber, Cowan, & Theobald, 2017), no previous study could be found which examined the relationship between the edTPA and the specialized type of teacher knowledge necessary for effective teaching, PCK (Shulman, 1986).…”