2017
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2016.1245638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threats to Validity in the edTPA Video Component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some leaders in the field have endorsed the edTPA, arguing that it offers a more authentic evaluation of the sophisticated knowledge and skills demanded of teachers and that it will improve teacher preparation programs and help restore credibility to the teaching profession (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 2019; American Federation of Teachers, 2012; Darling‐Hammond & Hyler, 2013; Sato, 2014; Whittaker, Pecheone, & Stansbury, 2018). Simultaneously, others have questioned the reliability and validity of the assessment as a predictive measure of teacher quality (Gitomer et al, 2019; Hébert, 2017; Parkes & Powell, 2015), in part, due to its reliance on possibly decontextualized 15–20‐min video clips evaluated by a distant reviewer (Choppin & Meuwissen, 2017; Dover & Schultz, 2016) and the extensive amount of writing it requires (Au, 2013; Denton, 2018; Ledwell & Oyler, 2016). While candidates' performance on the edTPA has been positively associated with other common measures of teacher quality, such as GPA (Cash, Putman, Polly, & Byker, 2019; Evans, Kelly, Baldwin, & Arnold, 2016) and assessments of teachers' content knowledge (Goldhaber, Cowan, & Theobald, 2017), no previous study could be found which examined the relationship between the edTPA and the specialized type of teacher knowledge necessary for effective teaching, PCK (Shulman, 1986).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some leaders in the field have endorsed the edTPA, arguing that it offers a more authentic evaluation of the sophisticated knowledge and skills demanded of teachers and that it will improve teacher preparation programs and help restore credibility to the teaching profession (American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 2019; American Federation of Teachers, 2012; Darling‐Hammond & Hyler, 2013; Sato, 2014; Whittaker, Pecheone, & Stansbury, 2018). Simultaneously, others have questioned the reliability and validity of the assessment as a predictive measure of teacher quality (Gitomer et al, 2019; Hébert, 2017; Parkes & Powell, 2015), in part, due to its reliance on possibly decontextualized 15–20‐min video clips evaluated by a distant reviewer (Choppin & Meuwissen, 2017; Dover & Schultz, 2016) and the extensive amount of writing it requires (Au, 2013; Denton, 2018; Ledwell & Oyler, 2016). While candidates' performance on the edTPA has been positively associated with other common measures of teacher quality, such as GPA (Cash, Putman, Polly, & Byker, 2019; Evans, Kelly, Baldwin, & Arnold, 2016) and assessments of teachers' content knowledge (Goldhaber, Cowan, & Theobald, 2017), no previous study could be found which examined the relationship between the edTPA and the specialized type of teacher knowledge necessary for effective teaching, PCK (Shulman, 1986).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In their “Limitations and Directions for Future Research” section, Kissau and Algozzine acknowledged that teaching performance on the edTPA is evaluated “based on a single 15‐minute video clip” (p. 131). In fact, a recent study has called into question the validity of the video component of the assessment (Choppin & Meuwissen, ). Further, anecdotal evidence by those researching the edTPA indicates that it is not uncommon for FL teacher candidates to receive high ratings despite the fact that they speak frequently in English (the students’ first language) in the videorecorded FL lessons that are submitted for evaluation (P. Swanson, personal communication, June 22, 2017).…”
Section: Content Knowledge Of Fl Teachers: Broaden or Compensate?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we examine the technical properties of edTPA scores as they relate to the validity of inferences and high-stakes decisions about individual teachers and teacher candidates. There are, of course, strong debates about the merits of high-stakes assessment in teacher education, and some critics (Choppin & Meuwissen, 2017; Greenblatt & O’Hara, 2015; Hutt, Gottlieb, & Cohen, 2018; Tuck & Gorlewski, 2016) argue that standardized assessments such as edTPA are inherently limited, counterproductive, or inappropriate (see also Cochran-Smith et al [2016] for a critique of edTPA). However, the critical analysis we undertake here is not philosophical in nature; nor does it represent a wholesale critique of the idea of high-stakes assessment of teaching or teachers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%