Luminescent transition metal complexes have been receiving increasing attention due to their role in a variety of optoelectronic applications. For example, molecular light-emitting devices (LEDs) have been increasingly reported 1 to exhibit superior efficiencies when phosphorescence is enhanced by the presence of a heavy metal because of spin-orbit coupling. 2 Other complexes have been suggested as selective chemical sensors for volatile organics, 3 oxygen, 4 and specific ions 5 because the phosphorescence is reversibly enhanced or quenched on interaction with these species. 6 An understanding of the nature of the luminescent excited state, in addition to its fundamental significance, is essential for designing new materials with improved properties for such applications.Monovalent gold complexes represent one of the most celebrated classes of luminescent complexes. Gold(I) complexes most commonly exist as two-coordinate (AuL 2 ) species, but three-(AuL 3 ), and four-coordinate (AuL 4 ) species also exist. 7 These species differ in the presence of Au-based luminescence. 6 While Au-based luminescence is usually absent in AuL 4 complexes, it exists in AuL 2 complexes only in the presence of Au‚‚‚Au interactions. Meanwhile, AuL 3 complexes exhibit Au-based luminescence both with and without Au‚‚‚Au interactions present. [8][9][10] Reports by Gray 8 and Fackler 9 on the photophysical properties of monomeric [AuL 3 ] + complexes illustrated visible luminescence with very large Stokes' shifts (typically 10 000 cm -1 ), which suggests a significant excitedstate distortion. These authors suggested that on the basis of extended Hückel calculations and experimental spectral observations, the Stokes' shift is a result of a M-L bond shortening due to excitation from an antibonding HOMO to a bonding LUMO. More accurate information is obtained by fully optimizing the geometry of the excited-state independently because the excited molecule (exciton) should be dealt with as a different entity that is distinct from the ground-state molecule. 11 The present work provides a dramatic illustration of this for [The calculations herein were of two types: QM (quantum mechanical) and QM/MM (hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical). A general description of the calculations is given below 12 while full details are available in the Supporting Information, including tests done with a variety of basis sets and different levels of theory to calibrate the computational accuracy. For QM calculations [Au(PH 3 ) 3 ] + was used as a model, and different methodologies, including ab initio and DFT, and basis sets with various complexities were employed. The geometries of all models were fully optimized in both the ground and excited electronic states, with the latter being the lowest triplet state because the experimental lifetime data suggested that the emitting state is phosphorescent. 8,9 For QM/ MM calculations, [AuL 3 ] + models were used with L ) PMe 3 , PPh 3 , PPhCy 2 , and TPA (tris(1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane)).The DFT calcul...