1976
DOI: 10.1017/s0020818300018282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three approaches to the measurement of power in international relations

Abstract: There are three main approaches to the observation and measurement of power: 1) control over resources, 2) control over actors, and 3) control over events and outcomes. The control over events and outcomes approach emerges as the best approach to the measurement of power in contemporary international politics because: 1) it is the only approach which takes into account the possibility of interdependence and collective action, 2) it is more general than the other two approaches, and 3) it produces a type of ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
10

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
41
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…I do not claim that power can be fully understood absent reference to preferences. The definition of power used here focuses on "control over events and outcomes" Hart (1976). I agree with Brams (1985, p. 107, note 6) that "a complete definition of power must include both preferences and outcomes.. .that is, power is the causation of outcomes by preferences."…”
Section: Seementioning
confidence: 86%
“…I do not claim that power can be fully understood absent reference to preferences. The definition of power used here focuses on "control over events and outcomes" Hart (1976). I agree with Brams (1985, p. 107, note 6) that "a complete definition of power must include both preferences and outcomes.. .that is, power is the causation of outcomes by preferences."…”
Section: Seementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Yum! Brands operations show an appreciation of the relationship between an emerging economic power, growing national pride and self-esteem, long established by scholars such as Hart (1976), Kwong (1994) and Douglass (2000). We see for example various initiatives by Yum!…”
Section: Cultural Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, territory and population were considered as the most obvious and available indicators to represent power [8]. Other variables, such as gross domestic product (GDP), armed forces personnel, military expenditure, and resource and energy consumption were also frequently employed in empirical studies [9,10]. Single indicators have the advantage of simplicity.…”
Section: Measuring Comprehensive National Powermentioning
confidence: 99%