1991
DOI: 10.1093/jac/28.5.765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-day treatment of typhoid fever with two different doses of ceftriaxone, compared to 14-day therapy with chloramphenicol: a randomized trial

Abstract: Fifty-nine adult Filipino patients suffering from typhoid fever documented by blood culture were randomly allocated to one of three different drug regimens. Nineteen patients received 3 g ceftriaxone iv once daily for three days. Twenty patients received 4 g ceftriaxone iv once daily for three days and 20 patients received oral chloramphenicol 3 g daily in divided doses for two days followed by 2 g daily for 12 days. Eighteen patients were cured (95%) with 3 g of ceftriaxone for three days. All patients receiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The succinate ester prodrug is used for intravenous or intramuscular administration and gives lower serum levels than the oral form (436,437). Chloramphenicol has been shown to be clinically effective in a number of studies (341,(438)(439)(440)(441)(442)(443)(444)(445)(446)(447). Disadvantages of chloramphenicol are its four-times-daily administration and the need to give it for at least 2 weeks to reduce the 10 to 15% risk of relapse.…”
Section: Traditional First-line Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The succinate ester prodrug is used for intravenous or intramuscular administration and gives lower serum levels than the oral form (436,437). Chloramphenicol has been shown to be clinically effective in a number of studies (341,(438)(439)(440)(441)(442)(443)(444)(445)(446)(447). Disadvantages of chloramphenicol are its four-times-daily administration and the need to give it for at least 2 weeks to reduce the 10 to 15% risk of relapse.…”
Section: Traditional First-line Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceftriaxone is generally safe to use, including in children, is slowly bactericidal against Salmonella serovar Typhi in vitro, and is able to penetrate and kill intracellular bacteria (463,464). Ceftriaxone has been used to treat typhoid in durations of 14 days (465-467), 7 days (342, 468-470), 5 days (440,(471)(472)(473), and 3 days (442,474,475). The proportion of patients cured has varied from 70% to more than 90%.…”
Section: Extended-spectrum Cephalosporinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of therapy with a 14-day course of CRO is considerable, frequently beyond the capacity of health care budgets (7). Several studies have therefore explored the potential of shorter courses of CRO for treating typhoid, ranging from 3 to 7 days, with impressive cure rates (1,11,14,17,22), but only a few such studies (1,11,22) have involved patients, especially children, with MDR typhoid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, newer antibiotics with good in vivo activity against Salmonella typhi are needed because of the alarming spread of R-factor-mediated chloramphenicol-resistant S. typhi throughout the world (3,4,11,23). Recently, ceftriaxone has emerged as a satisfactory alternative to chloramphenicol (1,2,5,8,10,12,13,21,22).Ceftriaxone has good broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including S. typhi (15). It has a long half-life in serum (ranging from 6.0 to 8.6 h), making it suitable for a once-daily dose regimen (16,20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%