To compare the therapeutic efficacy of ceftriaxone given once daily for 5 days and chloramphenicol given four times daily for 14 days, a controlled trial was carried out with 59 patients who were culture positive for SalmoneUla typhi. Ceftriaxone was given to 28 patients in once-daily intravenous doses of 75 mg/kg of body weight to children and 4 g to adults for 5 days; chloramphenicol was given to 31 patients at a dosage of 60 mg/kg/day until defervescence and then at 40 mg/kg/day to complete 14 days of treatment. All Salmonela isolates were susceptible to both antibiotics. Clinical cures (defervescence without complications, no relapse, and no need for further treatment) occurred in 79% of the patients treated with ceftriaxone and 90% of those treated with chloramphenicol (P = 0.37). On the third day of treatment, blood cultures were positive for S. typhi for 60%o of the patients in the chloramphenicol group and 0%o of the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.001).Defervescence occurred in half the patients in both groups during the first 7 days, but on days 9 to 13 after the start of treatment, nine patients in the ceftriaxone group, compared with six patients in the chloramphenicol group, remained febrile (P = 0.4). The median hematocrit and total leukocyte counts at day 14 were significantly lower for the chloramphenicol group than those for the ceftriaxone group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). These results indicate that the effects of therapy with ceftriaxone for typhoid fever differed from those of chloramphenicol therapy in that blood cultures became negative earlier, prolonged fever persisted in some patients, and bone marrow suppression was reduced. We conclude that a short, 5-day course of ceftriaxone is a useful alternative to conventional 14-day chloramphenicol therapy in the treatment of typhoid fever.Chloramphenicol has been the treatment of choice for typhoid fever for nearly 40 years, particularly in developing countries, where the cost of treatment is of considerable importance. However, newer antibiotics with good in vivo activity against Salmonella typhi are needed because of the alarming spread of R-factor-mediated chloramphenicol-resistant S. typhi throughout the world (3,4,11,23). Recently, ceftriaxone has emerged as a satisfactory alternative to chloramphenicol (1,2,5,8,10,12,13,21,22).Ceftriaxone has good broad-spectrum activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including S. typhi (15). It has a long half-life in serum (ranging from 6.0 to 8.6 h), making it suitable for a once-daily dose regimen (16,20). Randomized trials comparing chloramphenicol to ceftriaxone given once daily for 7 days for typhoid fever in Bangladesh (8) showed an efficacy of ceftriaxone comparable to that of chloramphenicol. The need for less expensive, shorter regimens prompted us to evaluate further the efficacy of ceftriaxone for treating typhoid fever in both children and adults; use of ceftriaxone would reduce the duration of therapy to 5 days, thereby lowering bed occupancy and hospitalization cost...