2015
DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00002-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections

Abstract: SUMMARY Salmonella enterica infections are common causes of bloodstream infection in low-resource areas, where they may be difficult to distinguish from other febrile illnesses and may be associated with a high case fatality ratio. Microbiologic culture of blood or bone marrow remains the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis. Antimicrobial resistance has emerged in Salmonella enterica , initially to the traditional first-line drugs chloramphenicol, ampicil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,045
2
33

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 922 publications
(1,107 citation statements)
references
References 559 publications
(473 reference statements)
27
1,045
2
33
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact infecting serotype of dengue virus could not be determined as virus isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are not readily available for clinical use in the country. Regarding the diagnosis of enteric fever, microbiologic culture of blood or bone marrow remains the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis 19,20 , whereas the role of Widal test is controversial 20,21 For the case presented here, the diagnosis of enteric fever was confirmed by positive blood culture. S. paratyphi A was resistant to azithromycin, though this is a reasonable choice in the current era of multi-drug resistant enteric fever.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the exact infecting serotype of dengue virus could not be determined as virus isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are not readily available for clinical use in the country. Regarding the diagnosis of enteric fever, microbiologic culture of blood or bone marrow remains the mainstay of laboratory diagnosis 19,20 , whereas the role of Widal test is controversial 20,21 For the case presented here, the diagnosis of enteric fever was confirmed by positive blood culture. S. paratyphi A was resistant to azithromycin, though this is a reasonable choice in the current era of multi-drug resistant enteric fever.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Sıklıkla ateş, ishal ve kas-eklem ağrıları eşlik eder. Literatürde en sık başvuru yakınmaları ateş, baş ağrısı, ishal, bulantı ve kusma olarak bildirilmiştir (19)(20)(21). Çalışmamızda değerlendirilen olguların tamamında gıda alı-mından ortalama 8-16 saat sonra yakınmalar başlamıştır.…”
Section: İrdelemeunclassified
“…Ayrıca trombositopeni, ALT/AST yüksekliği, CRP yüksekliği ve normositik anemi daha önce yapılan çalışmalarda bildirilmiştir (19). Çalışmamızda ise en sık lökositoz (%66) saptanırken trombositopeni (%11), ALT/ AST yüksekliği (%14) ve CRP düzeyinde artış (%62) bulundu.…”
Section: İrdelemeunclassified
“…Denne tilstanden vil vanligvis debutere i løpet av de første 1 -3 ukene etter hjemkomst (2). Pasienten rapporterte om tørrhoste, som kan ses ved tyfoid-/paratyfoidfeber.…”
unclassified