Three Decades of Social Science Research on High‐Level Nuclear Waste: Achievements and Future Challenges

Abstract

Research on high‐level nuclear waste management has focused on technical and scientific issues since the U.S. National Academy of Sciences first studied the problem in the mid‐1950s and recommended long‐term disposal in deep salt formations. In this review, we trace the development of the problem's definition and its associated research since socioeconomic, political, and policy issues were first given consideration and nuclear waste management became recognized as more than a technical problem. Three somewhat overlapping time periods can be identified. First, from the mid‐1970s to the early 1980s, initial research explored institutional dimensions of nuclear waste, among other subjects, while several countries attempted to officially solve the problem. The second period began in the early 1980s with a concerted effort to site nuclear waste repositories, and ended in the mid‐1990s with some progress in Sweden, Finland, and the United States, and general stalemate elsewhere. This period accelerated research on risk perception and stigma of nuclear waste, and elevated a focus on public trust. Special attention was given to repository siting conflicts in particular. The last period, since the mid‐1990s, has been characterized by failure and continuing political stalemate, with the major exception of Scandinavia, and increased attention to public participation, political systems, and international solutions. Questions of ethics have been given serious attention, while research on risk perceptions and siting conflicts continues. Thus, we see some signs of progress toward final disposal. We frame these periods in a broader context of the shifting role of applied social scientists. The paper concludes with a general discussion of this research area and prospects for future research.

Down the Line: Assessing the Trajectory of Energy Policy Research Development

“…Social scientists can also assist in communications regarding the technical aspects of UNF storage to the public and help to “frame policy in terms and values that matter most to the public” (Bonano et al, , p. 13). As nuclear energy issues move from being centered on technical knowledge to encompassing social and ethical implications, collaborations between policymakers and social scientists become more salient (Solomon et al, ).…”

Interdisciplinary perspectives on dose limits in radioactive waste management. A research paper developed within the ENTRIA project

“…It is the background of this research that made the anti-nuclear movement take a critical stance towards social scientists, as many activists considered the role of these researchers to be 'acceptance brokers' working for the nuclear industry. From the mid-1990s onwards and against the backdrop of many failed disposal projects worldwide, social scientists have broadened their perspectives and have taken into consideration ethical questions (for instance intergenerational justice) and alternative disposal options (like multi-national repositories) (Salomon et al 2010). Interconnections between research axes and political interests have also become a topic of social scientists' work (for instance : Macfarlane 2003).…”

Integrating societal concerns into research and development (R&D) on geological disposal at the national level

“…While the safety of deep GD has been the predominant domain of science and engineering, the acceptability of and participative approaches to siting disposal facilities has been the domain of the social sciences. Within this field of social-science research on high-level nuclear waste, Solomon et al (2010) identified three overlapping time periods. In the latter, since the mid-1990s, research has largely dealt with public participation, political systems and international solutions, as well as risk perception and siting conflicts.…”