2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional analysis of embankments on soft soils incorporating vertical drains by finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the finite element program has been assessed in several ground structures involving consolidation (Borges 1995(Borges , 2004Borges andCardoso 2001, 2002;Costa 2005;Domingues 2006) by comparing numerical results to field measurements. For instance, with regard to embankments on soft ground, Borges (1995) compared results of two geosynthetic-reinforced embankments, one constructed up to failure (Quaresma 1992) and the other observed until the end of consolidation (Yeo 1986;Basset 1986a, b).…”
Section: Finite Element Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the finite element program has been assessed in several ground structures involving consolidation (Borges 1995(Borges , 2004Borges andCardoso 2001, 2002;Costa 2005;Domingues 2006) by comparing numerical results to field measurements. For instance, with regard to embankments on soft ground, Borges (1995) compared results of two geosynthetic-reinforced embankments, one constructed up to failure (Quaresma 1992) and the other observed until the end of consolidation (Yeo 1986;Basset 1986a, b).…”
Section: Finite Element Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the last decade, improved and user-friendly three-dimensional finite element (3D) codes have emerged as a powerful tool capable of capturing ground response details that cannot be analysed using traditional 2D (plane strain) finite element software (Small and Zhang, 1991). For 3D analysis, a single row of drains with influence zones has been considered, but without considering a smear zone (Cheung et al 1991;Borges, 2004). This study demonstrates that a 3D analysis should be considered for embankments where the 2D plane strain condition may not be appropriate due to the nature of embankment geometry among the other reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the discrepancy between the measured and predicted consolidation based on the approximate 2D modelling techniques can be found from previous studies (Hird et al 1992). Borges (2004) described the advantages of 3D FEM for vertical drains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%