2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional analysis system for orthognathic surgery patients with jaw deformities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 Several authors have published the profile and frontal characteristics of the face by collecting the data via anthropometric measurements [6][7][8][9][10] or by using threedimensional imaging techniques. 15,19,23,25,32 The determination of the reliability of 2-dimensional photogrammetry for soft tissue evaluation might provide clinicians the ability to assess soft tissue from both profile and frontal views after orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 Several authors have published the profile and frontal characteristics of the face by collecting the data via anthropometric measurements [6][7][8][9][10] or by using threedimensional imaging techniques. 15,19,23,25,32 The determination of the reliability of 2-dimensional photogrammetry for soft tissue evaluation might provide clinicians the ability to assess soft tissue from both profile and frontal views after orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, superimposition of CBCT scans allows a three dimensional visualization of these effects. Similar to cephalometric tracings, 3D models constructed from CBCT scans could be superimposed manually by registering common stable landmarks or by best fit of stable anatomical regions [1], [2]. These two methods however depend on the accuracy of landmark definition and the precision of the 3D surface models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orthodontics, craniofacial surgery, and anthropometry focus on the detailed structural characteristics of maxillofacial deformities using various methods including the analyses of Delaire et al., Burstone et al., and Sassouni (1–3). Recent advances in three‐dimensional (3D) visualization technology that combine computer graphics and digital imaging have improved analysis and treatment planning (4–6). Furthermore, the transformation of two‐dimensional (2D) cephalometric analyses into 3D analyses has been validated showing that the difficulties were mainly related to the transposition of the reference points used in the analysis (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%