2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00167-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional automatic quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of the early approaches were based on the use of local properties of the image such as pixel intensity and gradient information (edges) combined with computational methods including graph search (Sonka et al (1995), von Birgelen et al (1996, Zhang et al (1998)), active surfaces (Klingensmith et al (2000)), active contours (Kovalski et al (2000)), and neural networks (Plissiti et al (2004)). In later approaches, segmentation was accomplished by the use of region and global information including texture (Mojsilovic et al (1997)), gray level variances (Haas et al (2000), Luo et al (2003)) contrast between the regions (Hui- Zhu et al (2002)), statistical properties of the image modeled by Rayleigh distributions using 2D (Haas et al (2000), Brusseau et al (2004)) and 3D information (Cardinal et al (2006)), and by mathematical morphology techniques (dos Santos Filho et al (2006)).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the early approaches were based on the use of local properties of the image such as pixel intensity and gradient information (edges) combined with computational methods including graph search (Sonka et al (1995), von Birgelen et al (1996, Zhang et al (1998)), active surfaces (Klingensmith et al (2000)), active contours (Kovalski et al (2000)), and neural networks (Plissiti et al (2004)). In later approaches, segmentation was accomplished by the use of region and global information including texture (Mojsilovic et al (1997)), gray level variances (Haas et al (2000), Luo et al (2003)) contrast between the regions (Hui- Zhu et al (2002)), statistical properties of the image modeled by Rayleigh distributions using 2D (Haas et al (2000), Brusseau et al (2004)) and 3D information (Cardinal et al (2006)), and by mathematical morphology techniques (dos Santos Filho et al (2006)).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where percentage difference ranges from zero, for complete agreement, to 100%, for complete disagreement between R 1 and R 2 (14,25,26). The only disadvantage of using nonoverlappingregion analysis is that it is invariant to the spatial shift between the 2 regions; therefore, the difference is also reported in conjunction with DSC to calculate the interobserver variability.…”
Section: Percentage Overlap ðRmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active contour principles have been used to allow the extraction of the borders in three dimensions after setting an initial contour in Kovalski et al's. approach [5]. However, the contour detection fails for low contrast interface regions such as the luminal border where the blood-wall interface in most images corresponds to weak pixel intensity variation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%