2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional cell-printing of advanced renal tubular tissue analogue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
124
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter has been addressed recently in valuable in vitro tools for drug screening and disease modeling, with proven apical-basal cell polarity, and active reabsorption and transepithelial secretion function. These models provided evidence for the fact that tubular 3D curvature and biomimetic ECM properties enhance kidney cell functionality [2,3,[5][6][7][8]. However, for the engineering of potentially implantable and durable kidney tubules, scaffolds must meet at least three criteria: they must be (1) small-sized and highly porous to increase the surface area, (2) freely accessible from the basolateral and luminal sides for rapid solute exchange and removal, and (3) flexible and yet strong enough to withstand intracorporeal forces such as pressure, tear and wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter has been addressed recently in valuable in vitro tools for drug screening and disease modeling, with proven apical-basal cell polarity, and active reabsorption and transepithelial secretion function. These models provided evidence for the fact that tubular 3D curvature and biomimetic ECM properties enhance kidney cell functionality [2,3,[5][6][7][8]. However, for the engineering of potentially implantable and durable kidney tubules, scaffolds must meet at least three criteria: they must be (1) small-sized and highly porous to increase the surface area, (2) freely accessible from the basolateral and luminal sides for rapid solute exchange and removal, and (3) flexible and yet strong enough to withstand intracorporeal forces such as pressure, tear and wear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To allow for rapid exchange of solutes between blood and urine, the epithelial and endothelial BM should be virtually the only barriers between both cell types. To date, tubular tissue engineering mostly relies on non-porous, large diameter tubular scaffolds (Ø > 2 mm) for sufficient self-support, or smaller tubular lumens (Ø < 1 mm) surrounded by hydrogels to account for physiological functions, including vectorial transport [2][3][4][5][6]. The latter has been addressed recently in valuable in vitro tools for drug screening and disease modeling, with proven apical-basal cell polarity, and active reabsorption and transepithelial secretion function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only that, 3D printing allows the simultaneous process of living cells and biomaterials, which provides tumor model with fine, replicating ECM on chips [35]. Using specific bio-ink formulations, 3D bioprinting is able to build different complex channels or ECM on chip and preserve the heterogeneity of the primary tumor [34,36]. In fact, for the organoid or biological scaffolds constructed by bio-printer, applying the mechanical force generated by fluid is able to simulate the metastasis of cancer cells in vivo.…”
Section: D Printed Microfluidic Chip and Cancer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Singh et al developed a vascularized kidney-on-a-chip consisting of a renal proximal tubule and blood vessels. This was achieved using direct, coaxial cell-printing and a hybrid bioink made of kidney dECM and alginate [ 123 ]. The hybrid bioink improved the viability and the expression of functional markers such as gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), aquaporin 1 (AQP1), and kidney-specific cadherin (KSP) in RPTECs compared to using medical-grade collagen type I bioink.…”
Section: Drug Screening Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The renal proximal tubular marker is presented in green, vascular endothelial markers are red, and nuclei are blue (scale bar: 100 μm); (iii) Albumin reabsorption between RTPEC and HUVEC tube via vectorial transport. Arrows indicate the intracellular accumulating albumin within the RPTEC and sidewall of the vessel (scale bar: 400 μm) (reproduced with permission from ref [ 123 ]; copyright 2020 Elsevier).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%