2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional direct numerical simulation of soot formation and transport in a temporally evolving nonpremixed ethylene jet flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
47
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the flow configuration, soot aggregates may lose mass due to the attack of molecular oxygen and hydroxyl radical onto the carbon. As indicated by experimental [19,20] and computational [21][22][23][24] studies, the formation and growth of soot in flames is affected strongly by turbulence, leading to 'soot-turbulence-chemistry interaction'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the flow configuration, soot aggregates may lose mass due to the attack of molecular oxygen and hydroxyl radical onto the carbon. As indicated by experimental [19,20] and computational [21][22][23][24] studies, the formation and growth of soot in flames is affected strongly by turbulence, leading to 'soot-turbulence-chemistry interaction'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the role of DNS in the development of LES closures for soot formation in turbulent flames is invaluable and fills a large knowledge gap left by incomplete experimental databases. There exists a growing number of DNS studies of soot formation in turbulent flames [21][22][23][24]28]. Bisetti et al [21] performed a DNS of soot formation and growth in a two-dimensional turbulent non-premixed flame subject to decaying turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the DSM approach remains prohibitively expensive for turbulent combustion simulation. Finally, as a reasonable compromise between fidelity and computational efficiency, the method of moments (Dobbins and Mulholland 1984;Frenklach 1985;Frenklach and Harris 1987;McGraw 1997;Wright et al 2001;Frenklach 2002;Moody and Collins 2003;Lignell et al 2008;Mueller et al 2009a,b) describes the key soot variables and the size distribution information by solving for a subset of moments of the PSDF, which are transported along with the gas-phase species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method of moments has been utilized in DNS for various nanoparticle-related simulations over the last decade (Moody and Collins 2003;Garrick 2003, 2004), but its use in sooting flames has been limited. Lignell and coworkers (Lignell et al 2008(Lignell et al , 2009) conducted DNS of turbulent nonpremixed sooting flames using the method of moments with logarithmic interpolative closure, employing a semi-empirical soot chemistry description. More recently, a method based on bivariate moment variables Mueller et al 2009a) has been developed and implemented in DNS (Bisetti et al 2009(Bisetti et al , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These laboratory-scale laminar and turbulent flame studies can reveal important physical characteristics of fundamental combustion processes in practical devices. Recent combustion DNS studies incorporated advanced multi-physics models to describe soot formation, radiative heat transfer, and spray evaporation, providing temporally and spatially resolved combustion events with detailed information of turbulence-flame interaction characteristics [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%