2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2018.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three dimensional discrete element method simulations of interface shear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To facilitate the interpretation of macroscale responses, microscale metrics such as contact normal force distribution, contact networks, mobilization of friction, and particle rotation were calculated to elucidate the wall friction mechanism. The DEM simulations also exhibited a bi-linear relation between the interface resistance and normalized wall roughness [25,70]. The critical normalized roughness was found to be about 0.4 [25,77].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To facilitate the interpretation of macroscale responses, microscale metrics such as contact normal force distribution, contact networks, mobilization of friction, and particle rotation were calculated to elucidate the wall friction mechanism. The DEM simulations also exhibited a bi-linear relation between the interface resistance and normalized wall roughness [25,70]. The critical normalized roughness was found to be about 0.4 [25,77].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The relationship between the values of u w,max and R n and between u w,res and R n was bilinear as, e.g. in experiments [19,48] and DEM analyses [25,70] (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Evolution Of Mobilized Wall Friction Angle and Volumetric Stmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations