1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.114184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional electron probe roughness analysis of InP sidewalls processed by reactive ion beam etching

Abstract: A quantitative three-dimensional measurement of sidewall roughness of InP etched by chlorine-based reactive ion beam etching (RIBE) is presented. An electron probe surface roughness analyzer using four secondary electron detectors was employed. The minimum value of average sidewall roughness under the optimized etching condition was as small as 1 nm, where the etching condition was an ion extraction voltage of 400 V and a Cl2 gas pressure of 1.2×10−3 Torr. It is found that the etched sidewall roughness can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a SEM-based measurement technique ͑electron probe roughness analyzer͒ has been utilized to obtain the roughness of an etched sidewall profile. 7 The method has an advantage as a noncontact measurement technique, but its resolution was limited to 1 nm. 7 An AFM has better sensitivity in characterizing planar surface morphology than SEM, but it is difficult to use in measuring the vertical surface of three-dimensional ͑3-D͒ structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a SEM-based measurement technique ͑electron probe roughness analyzer͒ has been utilized to obtain the roughness of an etched sidewall profile. 7 The method has an advantage as a noncontact measurement technique, but its resolution was limited to 1 nm. 7 An AFM has better sensitivity in characterizing planar surface morphology than SEM, but it is difficult to use in measuring the vertical surface of three-dimensional ͑3-D͒ structures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The method has an advantage as a noncontact measurement technique, but its resolution was limited to 1 nm. 7 An AFM has better sensitivity in characterizing planar surface morphology than SEM, but it is difficult to use in measuring the vertical surface of three-dimensional ͑3-D͒ structures. This is especially true where the 3-D structures consist of small geometries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, an SEM-based measurement technique for line edge roughness (LER) was used to characterize the roughness of etched sidewalls [6]. This technique defines the edge roughness using a line demarcated by the point extending furthest from the sidewall at each position along the line.…”
Section: Fin Sidewall Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SEM-based measurement technique using electron probe roughness analyzer has been utilized to obtain the roughness of an etched sidewall profile. This technique was advantageous as it is non-contact measurement technique and sample damage can be prevented; however, its resolution was limited to 1 nm [53]. AFM is well suited for the measurement of surface roughness in the nanometer scale and is better than SEM, but it is difficult to use to measure the vertical surface of three-dimensional (3-D) structures due to the reasons above.…”
Section: Measurement Of Swr and Lermentioning
confidence: 99%