2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional flow around a square cylinder near a wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of both coefficients is surprisingly close to that measured by Roshko et al (1975) for the case of a circular cylinder. In comparison to other numerical studies, the present values for the drag coefficient are close to those of Mahir (2009) and somewhat lower than those of Kumaran and Vengadesan (2007).…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The variation of both coefficients is surprisingly close to that measured by Roshko et al (1975) for the case of a circular cylinder. In comparison to other numerical studies, the present values for the drag coefficient are close to those of Mahir (2009) and somewhat lower than those of Kumaran and Vengadesan (2007).…”
Section: Studysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Two-and three-dimensional studies for a square cylinder near a stationary wall have been conducted by Mahir (2009). The mean drag force decreased as the cylinder was brought close to a wall.…”
Section: Flows Around a Single Cylinder Close To A Plane Wallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation points on a square obstacle are generally placed at the corner points and, as a result, exert significant influences on flow and heat transfer features. The presence of a wall in the neighbourhood of a square obstacle was studied numerically in [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and the detailed discussion on the literature is now available in our recent work [1]. The two-and three-dimensional (3-D) effects were investigated on a square cylinder located at G = 0.2-4 for Re = 175, 185 and 250 [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%