Artificial Intelligence for Biology and Agriculture 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-5048-4_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction Procedure for Food Microstructure Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution in the z ‐direction is the most important in acquiring a series of 2‐D layered images. The resolution in the z ‐direction depends on the numerical aperture of the lens, the degree to which the pinhole is open, and the wavelength of the laser light (Ding and Gunasekaran 1998). The minimum z ‐axial resolution and maximum observation depth achieved by CLSM used in this study was 50 nm and 200 μm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution in the z ‐direction is the most important in acquiring a series of 2‐D layered images. The resolution in the z ‐direction depends on the numerical aperture of the lens, the degree to which the pinhole is open, and the wavelength of the laser light (Ding and Gunasekaran 1998). The minimum z ‐axial resolution and maximum observation depth achieved by CLSM used in this study was 50 nm and 200 μm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such techniques do not allow a quantitative determination of microstructure parameters that would enable the characteristics of the cheese structure and its irregularities to be described. Ding and Gunasekaran (1998) developed a 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional image reconstruction procedure for the study of Cheddar cheese microstructure by confocal scanning laser microscopy, quantifying with good precision the variation in particle size and shape between the 2-dimensional and the reconstructed 3-dimensional images. Later, Everett and Auty (2008) pointed to the need to use 3-dimensional images to describe the complex protein matrix structure in a more real and complete way because 2-dimensional images provide information only on the particle shape and surface in the first plane, without showing how the particles link together or their distribution along the x-, y-, and z-axes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cell analysis is another important application field of the CBMIA approaches, referring to cell migration analysis (Boucher et al 1998), multiple cell detection (Yao et al 2005;Pasquale and Stander 2009), blood cell classification (Tuzel et al 2007), cell segmentation (Korzynska et al 2007), semen cell quality analysis (Witkowski 2013), cell nucleus detection (Nogueira and Teofilo 2014;John et al 2016), stem cell analysis (Huang et al 2016;Zhang et al 2016;Li et al 2017), antibody analysis (Soda et al 2009;Neuman et al 2013), pathological tissue analysis (Tasoulis et al 2014;Jothi and Rajam 2017) and so on. Material analysis is also an important application domain of the CBMIA methods, including food microstructure analysis (Ding and Gunasekaran 1998), collagen fiber analysis (Elbischger et al 2004), metallography image analysis (Grzegorzek 2010), membranes porosity evaluation (Chwojnowski et al 2012), cement quality analysis (Wang et al 2014) and so on. Furthermore, because medial image analysis needs to solve many similar technical problems as the CBMIA tasks , it can also share a lot of research strategies from the CBMIA field and extend them to related application tasks, like cerebral cortical analysis (Suri et al 2002), MRI image analysis (Balafar et al 2010a, b), retinal vessel analysis ), brain network analysis (Qi et al 2015(Qi et al , 2016 and so on.…”
Section: Potential Application Fields Of Cbmia Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%