2013
DOI: 10.3182/20130902-5-de-2040.00075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional Impact Angle Control Guidance Law for Missiles Using Dual Sliding Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact angle guidance laws have also been derived using coupled engagement dynamics. [8][9][10][11] These guidance laws do not guarantee convergence of errors and their derivatives within a finite time. In fact, the papers [8][9] do not provide an analysis of the sliding mode dynamics for the chosen switching surface and it satisfies the objectives of the guidance law after occurrence of sliding mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact angle guidance laws have also been derived using coupled engagement dynamics. [8][9][10][11] These guidance laws do not guarantee convergence of errors and their derivatives within a finite time. In fact, the papers [8][9] do not provide an analysis of the sliding mode dynamics for the chosen switching surface and it satisfies the objectives of the guidance law after occurrence of sliding mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[2][3][4] In the literature, there exist only a few papers that address the impact angle problem in a 3D engagement scenario using SMC. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] In Sun and Zheng, 5 Hu et al, 6 and Feng and Song 7 the 3D engagement dynamics is first decoupled into two mutually orthogonal 2D planes and then the guidance laws are designed independently for both the planes. In both Sun and Zheng 5 and Hu et al, 6 the optimal control theory is used to derive the reference model and optimal guidance law, respectively, using linearized 2D engagement dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Wang et al 16 investigated a partial integrated guidance and control design for an interception with terminal impact angle constraints in three-dimensional space by using the sliding mode control. Lee et al 17 gave a three-dimensional guidance law for missiles with terminal impact angle constraints by using the sliding mode control scheme with dual sliding surfaces. Biswas et al 18 designed a three-dimensional guidance law with terminal impact angle constraints for manoeuvering targets by using dynamic inversion and sliding mode control techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these terminal angle constrained guidance laws are developed in a planar case, which assumes decoupled three-dimensional (3D) engagement dynamics. However, a real 3D interception is more practical for guidance law design, which attracts the recent study on the design of 3D guidance laws [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Thus, it is of practical significance to investigate the terminal angle constrained guidance law in the 3D space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, adaptive multivariable twisting and super-twisting controls were employed to handle the impact angle constrained 3D guidance problems in [24,25]. In [26,27], the 3D guidance law was derived via the Lyapunov-based approach and SMC with dual sliding surfaces. Using the rotation angle and Euler axis of quaternion, the impact angle constraint was achieved in a 3D space in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%