1984
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0728(84)80207-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional nucleation with diffusion controlled growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
436
0
32

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 624 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
12
436
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Here I will mention only the pioneering work of Erdey-Gruz and Volmer [31], who were the first to notice that nuclei of the new phase were formed on some preferred sites on the electrode surface, the work of Fleischmann and Thirsk [32], who considered the case of equally active sites and the works of Kaischev and Mutaftschiev [33], Markov et al [34][35][36] and Fletcher et al [37][38][39][40][41][42], who examined the nucleus formation on active sites with different activities with respect to the process of nucleus formation. Attention should be paid also to the works of Sharifker and Mostany [43], Sluyters-Rehbach et al [44,45], Mirkin and Nilov [46], Heerman and Tarallo [47][48][49][50] and Danilov et al [51][52][53], who contributed essentially to this very important subject, too (see also Ref. [30] and the references cited therein).…”
Section: Non-stationary Nucleation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here I will mention only the pioneering work of Erdey-Gruz and Volmer [31], who were the first to notice that nuclei of the new phase were formed on some preferred sites on the electrode surface, the work of Fleischmann and Thirsk [32], who considered the case of equally active sites and the works of Kaischev and Mutaftschiev [33], Markov et al [34][35][36] and Fletcher et al [37][38][39][40][41][42], who examined the nucleus formation on active sites with different activities with respect to the process of nucleus formation. Attention should be paid also to the works of Sharifker and Mostany [43], Sluyters-Rehbach et al [44,45], Mirkin and Nilov [46], Heerman and Tarallo [47][48][49][50] and Danilov et al [51][52][53], who contributed essentially to this very important subject, too (see also Ref. [30] and the references cited therein).…”
Section: Non-stationary Nucleation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, to assure this, and due to the fact that the occurrence of a 3D process in electrodeposition has been widely reported in the literature, a non dimensional analysis accounting for a 3D growth process has also been carried out. This analysis is made according to equations (3) [23][24][25] and is shown in Figure 8. The experimental curves lie in between those corresponding to instantaneous nucleation (IN) and progressive nucleation (PN), but curve (2) in Figure 8 is closer to progressive nucleation, even though it does not fit the theoretical curve perfectly, especially at the very beginning of the transient.…”
Section: Analysis Of the I-t Transients (Figures 4 And 5) Indicates Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) The studies of the potentiostatic current transient of the electrochemical nucleation and growth have been carried out by Gunawardena, Scharifker, Astley, and Hills et al [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Valderrama et al 15) studied the electrodeposition of indium thin films on Mo/Cu substrates using chronoamperometry. They applied their results to the electrocrystallization theories developed by Scharifker et al [8][9][10] and observed that the nucleation of indium on Mo/Cu was adjusted to a three-dimensional growth under instantaneous nucleation limited by diffusion. Huang et al 16) observed a two-step film growth behavior during the electrodeposition of indium on copper substrates and proposed a hypothesis involving the Cu-In interdiffusion and the Cu-In alloy formation.…”
Section: 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%