2014
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Printed Multiphase Scaffolds for Regeneration of Periodontium Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
179
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
179
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…[44][45][46][47][48] The discrepancy in size between scaffolds tested in vitro and scaffolds applied in bone defects are often large, so we sought to assess the osteogenic potential on large, clinically relevant scaffolds. Parallels between static in vitro culturing and an in vivo environment in terms of nutrient flow and micro environmental conditions are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46][47][48] The discrepancy in size between scaffolds tested in vitro and scaffolds applied in bone defects are often large, so we sought to assess the osteogenic potential on large, clinically relevant scaffolds. Parallels between static in vitro culturing and an in vivo environment in terms of nutrient flow and micro environmental conditions are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 With this aim, various strategic scaffold multiphasic architectures have been developed: bone scaffolds combined with an occlusive membrane, 10,11 layered biphasic scaffolds for bone and ligament compartments 12 -16 and layered triphasic scaffolds for cementum, periodontal ligament and bone compartment. 17 Regenerative approaches toward in situ periodontal tissue regeneration are frequently based on endogenous resources such as cells and growth factors. 4 The most exploited strategy involves a scaffolding material (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] However, it remains difficult to create three-dimensional scaffolds using these techniques without the presence of a more complex and customizable system such as a 3-D printer that could position fibers in directions relevant to the anatomical structure of tissue we attempt to model, thereby recapitulating its unique geometric complexity. Additive manufacturing has been used extensively for guided tissue regeneration of PDL-like structures, [10, 12] but micro-level control over scaffold structure is constrained by limited resolution and material selection. To address these limitations, our approach focuses on using a combination of 3-D printing and micropatterning to create a scaffold with the dual function of presenting features on the macro and micro-level for guidance of bulk and oriented tissue formation (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9, 10] Costa et al and Vaquette et al employed PCL for the bone compartment and electrospun PCL for the PDL region, [11] while Lee et al used a layered 3-D printed scaffold with three PCL interphases for the cementum, PDL, and alveolar bone. [12] However, the precise effect of topography on the guidance of PDL-like tissue formation in vivo has not been thoroughly explored to understand how micro-scale patterning affects the regenerative outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%