1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(99)00008-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of fetal tooth buds for characterization of facial clefts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge that when a 2D image is not obtained, a 3D image might also be difficult to obtain. However, several authors reported that trained or specialized sonographers have an increased ability to diagnose cleft lips and their severity using 3DUS and need significantly shorter time periods to interpret findings [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Despite these benefits, the question of whether or not inexperienced sonographers can obtain similar results compared with experienced operators has never been studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We acknowledge that when a 2D image is not obtained, a 3D image might also be difficult to obtain. However, several authors reported that trained or specialized sonographers have an increased ability to diagnose cleft lips and their severity using 3DUS and need significantly shorter time periods to interpret findings [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Despite these benefits, the question of whether or not inexperienced sonographers can obtain similar results compared with experienced operators has never been studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common difficulties in 2D US scanning are related to visualization rates of the fetal face, mandible, lip, palate, tooth germs, distal part of the extremities, fingers and toes. [7][8][9][10] Depiction rate of these structures are significantly higher with 3D US (Table 1). 2,3,4,9 The data presented in Table 1 indicate that 3D US examination should be performed whenever 2D US is incapable to visualize these structures.…”
Section: Visualization Of Normal Fetal Anatomymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Due to their affection in malformation syndromes and chromosomal abnormalitie, regions of special interest are fetal maxilla, mandible arch, ear and nose. Ulm et al reported better visualization rate of tooth germs with 3D US than 2D US (31% vs 8.8%) 9 Merz et al studied 125 fetuses to examine the effect of 3D US imaging on evaluation of the axis of facial profile. 10 They found that in 30.4% of the results, the profile section of 2D US facial profiles had a bias of 3-20º compared with an optimal mid-sagittal section obtained by 3D US.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). [25][26][27][28] It allows obtaining of true midsagittal plane of the fetal face, important for appropriate evaluation of different facial structures, specially to measure the naso-frontal angle, the assessment of the ocular biometry and the interorbitary distance for the diagnosis of the hyper or hypotelorism, or the assessment of the maxilar and mandible in the diagnosis of micrognathia and retrognathia.…”
Section: Fetal Face Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%