2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Dimensional Ultrasound in the Management of Bladder Endometriosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TVS was superior to cystoscopy and at least as effective as MRI in diagnosing and planning surgery for BE. The authors of this study suggested that 3D acquisition may improve endometriotic nodule localization and evaluation of its size, volume, and infiltration of the bladder wall in comparison to two-dimensional TVS [66].…”
Section: Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…TVS was superior to cystoscopy and at least as effective as MRI in diagnosing and planning surgery for BE. The authors of this study suggested that 3D acquisition may improve endometriotic nodule localization and evaluation of its size, volume, and infiltration of the bladder wall in comparison to two-dimensional TVS [66].…”
Section: Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies have compared these imaging modalities in the aim of determining the optimal noninvasive method for diagnosis. [21][22][23][24] Unlike rectovaginal or rectal deep infiltrative endometriosis, there is a lack of consensus in the ideal imaging technique for evaluating bladder endometriosis, with some studies demonstrating advantages with ultrasound, some showing benefits of MRI, and others yet showing similar diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases of advanced cervical cancer, the lesion clearly involves the cervix and very often lateral parametrial and paracervical tissues. 26 Three-dimensional US was proposed as a useful tool to assess bladder endometriosis mainly for the assessment of the distance between the nodule and the ureters and the trigone, 27 especially in cases of large nodules (see case 5; Figure 1, asterisks). Nevertheless, this technique adds very little to the potential differential diagnosis from bidimensional US.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%