2012
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2011.2151814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-Phase Weinberg Isolated DC–DC Converter: Analysis, Design, and Experimentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also observed that the maximum input current ripple value in R1 region is truenormalΔIU1=1 for D = 0, while in R2 and R3, the maximum value are truenormalΔIU1=1false/4 and truenormalΔIU1=1false/12 for D = 1/2 and D = 5/6, respectively. The variation of input current ripple as a function of the duty cycle as proven, and their behavior is similar to the input current ripple of the three‐phase dc‐dc converters studied in Andersen and Barbi and Larico and Barbi …”
Section: Steady‐state Analysis Of Proposed Convertersupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also observed that the maximum input current ripple value in R1 region is truenormalΔIU1=1 for D = 0, while in R2 and R3, the maximum value are truenormalΔIU1=1false/4 and truenormalΔIU1=1false/12 for D = 1/2 and D = 5/6, respectively. The variation of input current ripple as a function of the duty cycle as proven, and their behavior is similar to the input current ripple of the three‐phase dc‐dc converters studied in Andersen and Barbi and Larico and Barbi …”
Section: Steady‐state Analysis Of Proposed Convertersupporting
confidence: 62%
“…According to Table , it can be seen that for duty cycle higher than 1/3, the dc voltage gain of proposed converter is two‐third of Andersen and Barbi, and the voltage stress in the R2 region is slightly higher. However, the switch voltage stress is not equal and higher than that of the topology in Larico and Barbi . On the other hand, the switch current stress in the proposed converter is 34 % less than that one proposed in Andersen and Barbi, as can be verified by Table , since it reduces the switches conduction losses.…”
Section: Comparison Between Proposed Converter and Others Three‐phasementioning
confidence: 61%
“…In order to demonstrate the circuit advantages of the proposed converter, a detailed comparison with other converters is carried out and the results are presented in Table I. Compared with the three phase Weinberg converter in [24], the proposed converter has a lower main voltage stress and a lower switching loss due to the active clamp structure. The expandable characteristic and modular structure are also the merits of proposed converter.…”
Section: Iii. Proposed Topologies For Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 1, presents the y-cycle range and its t mode for D ≤ 0,33 he reduction on the size are respectively is one of the most expensive elements in the pr current sources divides the c disadvantage of this topology presented in [9] and [12] is components which are aggreg As advantages, the Pushpassive components in th inductance value is lower Flyback-Boost converter be three times the switching fre the current efforts are higher three times higher than in current increase causes a h core.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Converter In Crcmmentioning
confidence: 99%