2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40368-020-00574-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Three-year performance of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class II primary molar restorations

Abstract: PURPOSE To compare the clinical failure rate of two resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) used for Class II primary molar restorations over a 3-year period. METHODS Healthy, cooperative children aged 4-8 years with carious, asymptomatic primary molars requiring class II restorations received either nano-filled (Ketac Nano, 3 M ESPE) or regular (Vitremer, 3 M ESPE) RMGIC restorations. These were blindly assessed semiannually for 3 years using the modified USPHS criteria with all-cause failure as primary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glass ionomer cements with superior handling properties have been the material of choice to date. However, glass ionomer cements are more prone to occlusal wear [ 1 ] and mechanical strength of the same does not reach par with amalgam. Composite resins on the other hand, in spite of being technique sensitive are proven to exhibit superior mechanical and aesthetic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass ionomer cements with superior handling properties have been the material of choice to date. However, glass ionomer cements are more prone to occlusal wear [ 1 ] and mechanical strength of the same does not reach par with amalgam. Composite resins on the other hand, in spite of being technique sensitive are proven to exhibit superior mechanical and aesthetic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%