Therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia has evolved rapidly over the last decade, with the introduction in the early 1990s of new agents such as a 1 -blockers and 5a-reductase inhibitors. The major advantage of a 1 -blockers over 5a-reductase inhibitors is their rapid onset of action. Maximum¯ow rate is improved after ®rst administration and optimal symptom relief is usually reached within 2 ± 3 months. In addition, a 1 -blockers are effective regardless of prostate size and they provide a similar degree of symptom relief in patients with or without bladder outlet obstruction. The main adverse events with the a 1 -blockers relate to their effects on the cardiovascular system (postural hypotension) and central penetration (asthenia, somnolence). Newer uroselective a 1 -blockers, such as alfuzosin and tamsulosin, have a better safety pro®le and, as such, do not require initial dose titration. Alfuzosin has also been shown in a sixmonth study to signi®cantly reduce both residual urine and the incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR) compared with placebo. In addition, alfuzosin is effective in improving the success rate of a trial without catheter in patients with AUR.Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia; prostate; a 1 -blockers; 5a-reductase inhibitors; acute urinary retention; LUTS
Management of BPHTherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved considerably over the past century. Performance of open prostatectomy, routine until 20 ± 25 years ago, has been gradually replaced by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), which is now the preferred surgical procedure worldwide. At the start of the 1990s, new therapies which were less interventional than TURP were introduced, such as thermotherapy, laser therapy and therapies involving radiofrequencies, e.g. transurethral needle ablation. To date, most of these techniques are still regarded as investigational and additional randomized studies focusing on costs and durability of symptomatic improvement are needed.The development of medical therapy for BPH has been a long process, beginning with phytotherapy in Egyptian times. In the mid-1970s, the better understanding of the pathophysiology of BPH led to the ®rst use of phenoxybenzamine, an irreversible antagonist of both a 1 /a 2 adrenoceptors. Medical management of BPH suddenly exploded at the beginning of the 1990s with the introduction of selective a 1 -blockers and 5a-reductase inhibitors.In terms of treatment goals for BPH, the two main objectives are to reduce symptoms and relieve obstruction. Obstruction and symptoms are not correlated, however, and patients may present with signi®cant symptoms but no obstruction. Consequently, it is important to distinguish between different patient types in order that the most appropriate treatment be given.
TURPDramatic reduction in the use of TURP for the treatment of BPH worldwide have been reported, with perhaps the greatest decline in number of procedures being noted in the US (Figure 1). 1 TURP constituted 94% of all BPH surgery in 1995 in the US,...