1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0000(93)90001-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold circuits of bounded depth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…† Supported in part by an NSF Graduate Fellowship. a number of models of computation; it appears to be at the heart of complexity questions, especially in highly parallel models (shallow circuits) [13,14,25,6,20], space-bounded computation (including the related models of decision trees and branching programs) [8,5,11], and hardness results required for the construction of pseudorandom generators for shallow circuits [17] and for space-bounded computation [5]. Nisan applied communication complexity to threshold circuits with no depth restriction [19].…”
Section: Brief Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† Supported in part by an NSF Graduate Fellowship. a number of models of computation; it appears to be at the heart of complexity questions, especially in highly parallel models (shallow circuits) [13,14,25,6,20], space-bounded computation (including the related models of decision trees and branching programs) [8,5,11], and hardness results required for the construction of pseudorandom generators for shallow circuits [17] and for space-bounded computation [5]. Nisan applied communication complexity to threshold circuits with no depth restriction [19].…”
Section: Brief Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves the depth unchanged and at most doubles the size which makes no difference for our asymptotic results.) We recall the "discriminator lemma" of Hajnal et al [15]: Our goal is to show that as long as D does not assign too much probability weight to any single point then there is some parity function χA (where A is small as described below) which has nonnegligible correlation with f under D. Toward this end we use the main lemma of Linial et al [23]: Since each Fourier coefficientĈD(A) has magnitude at most 1, we have that |A| k |ĈD(A)| is at most n k , and thus |ED[fχA]| 1/(2sn k ) for some |A| k. Thus we have proved the following lemma:…”
Section: The Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for constant depth threshold circuits only slightly super linear lower 1 Since gv is not necessarily a symmetric function, we need to order the inputs to v, so we know which input is the first variable of gv etc. bounds are known [12] (exponential lower bounds are known for depth 2 [10]). …”
Section: Circuits With Arbitrary Gatesmentioning
confidence: 99%