2020
DOI: 10.1108/jed-01-2020-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa: a new evidence

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study is to seek to re-examine the threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa.Design/methodology/approachThis study applies panel smooth transition regression approach advanced by González et al. (2017). The method allows for both heterogeneity as well as a smooth change of regression coefficients from one regime to another.FindingsA debt threshold in the range of 62–66% is estimated for the whole sample. Low debt is found to be growth neutral but higher public deb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
36
2
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
36
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, government efficiency, corruption control and regulatory quality greatly influence the negative impact of public debt on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Ndoricimpa (2020) examined the threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa. Using the GMM technique to control debt endogeneity, the author found that low debt is neutral for real GDP growth.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, government efficiency, corruption control and regulatory quality greatly influence the negative impact of public debt on economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Ndoricimpa (2020) examined the threshold effects of public debt on economic growth in Africa. Using the GMM technique to control debt endogeneity, the author found that low debt is neutral for real GDP growth.…”
Section: The Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these factors are oil prices (Rostin et al, 2019;Akinsola and Odhiambo, 2020), oil price volatility (Eyden et al, 2019;Maheu et al, 2020), energy consumption (Ozcan and Ozturk, 2019;Wei et al, 2020), money supply and internet (Saidi et al, 2020). Other factors include information and communication technology (ICT) (Bahrini and Qaffas, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2020), consumption expenditure (Rumbia et al, 2020), inflation (Karahan and Çolak, 2020) and public debt (Bexheti et al, 2020;Ndoricimpa, 2020). Based on the research sites, studies investigating these factors can be grouped into two research groups: the group of studies conducted in a particular country and the group of studies carried out in a group of countries in the form of panels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Omodero ve Alpheaus (2019) çalışmalarında dış borç servisinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisini pozitif olarak tespit ederken Silva (2020) kamu ve özel sektör dış borcunun kamu yatırımları üzerindeki etkisini pozitif olarak tespit etmiştir. Bazı çalışmalarda ise dış borcun ekonomik büyümeyi pozitif etkilediği seviyenin sınır düzeyi (eşik değer) ülkelere göre tespit edilmiştir (Pattillo vd., 2011;Ndoricimpa, 2017;Ndoricimpa, 2020;N'Zue, 2020;Kazakova ve Inaba, 2018;Dao ve Oanh, 2011). Söz konusu çalışmalarda ülkelere göre farklılık gösteren eşik değerlere ulaşılmıştır.…”
Section: Dışlama (Crowding Out) Teorisiunclassified