2017
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Threshold values for very high cycle fatigue failure of high‐strength steels

Abstract: Cracks leading to failure in very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) of high‐strength steels mostly initiate at subsurface inclusions at stress intensity factors (SIF) below the classical threshold value Kth for long cracks, especially for negative stress ratios. Here, a characteristic fine granular area (FGA) can be observed at the fracture surface in the vicinity of these initiating inclusions. According to various researchers, the FGA formation might be responsible for the late initiation of a propagable long crack.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, assuming that the explanation given in the last section (i.e., that the fatigue limit is reduced by an environmental interaction and dissolved hydrogen, and Equation 5 generally serves well to predict the fatigue limit of the investigated steel in the presence of surface defects) is correct, there must be a reason for the observed reduction in fatigue strength in the case of internal fracture in the VHCF regime. Also, similar (nonconservative) results are reported for other ultrahigh‐strength steels, 52,53 although Equation 5 is in good agreement with experimentally determined fatigue strengths in the VHCF regime for high‐strength steels (with tensile strength below 2 GPa), 50,54–56 even in the case of failure from internal inclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless, assuming that the explanation given in the last section (i.e., that the fatigue limit is reduced by an environmental interaction and dissolved hydrogen, and Equation 5 generally serves well to predict the fatigue limit of the investigated steel in the presence of surface defects) is correct, there must be a reason for the observed reduction in fatigue strength in the case of internal fracture in the VHCF regime. Also, similar (nonconservative) results are reported for other ultrahigh‐strength steels, 52,53 although Equation 5 is in good agreement with experimentally determined fatigue strengths in the VHCF regime for high‐strength steels (with tensile strength below 2 GPa), 50,54–56 even in the case of failure from internal inclusions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Particularly for failures after a high number of cycles, a fine granular area (FGA) may be observed in the center of the fisheye around the critical inclusion [6,7]. Many studies have shown that the formation of the FGA plays a significant role in crack initiation and eventual fracture [8][9][10][11][12]. However, the forming mechanism of the FGA is not fully understood [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to crack initiation from the surface or from the interior of a specimen, there is a tendency for S-N curves to have a twofold or stepwise shape for high-strength steels [11,12]. Fatigue crack initiation at the interior of the specimen always originated from relevant inhomogeneity, usually an inclusion [13,14], due to localized plastic deformation constraints and stress concentrations [4,15]. For the internal crack initiation of VHCF, a rough region around the inclusion was observed and called the fine granular area (FGA) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%