2009
DOI: 10.1899/08-113.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thresholds in macroinvertebrate biodiversity and stoichiometry across water-quality gradients in Central Plains (USA) streams

Abstract: Abstract. N and P often limit primary and secondary production in ecosystems, but they also can cause eutrophication and negatively influence sensitive species above a certain level or threshold point. Aquatic biodiversity can have negative threshold relationships with water-quality variables at large scales, but the specific mechanism(s) driving these threshold relationships are not well established. We hypothesized that resource quality (i.e., C:P) might partly drive primary consumer (grazer and detritivore)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
92
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
92
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We used EPT because it and other taxonomic richness metrics are among the most widely used metrics of stream biological condition and have been used in recent threshold analyses (e.g., Evans-White et al 2009). We used B-IBI because it combines several univariate community metrics into an aggregate index and is directly applicable to management because it is used in Maryland to classify streams according to biological condition (Klauda et al 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used EPT because it and other taxonomic richness metrics are among the most widely used metrics of stream biological condition and have been used in recent threshold analyses (e.g., Evans-White et al 2009). We used B-IBI because it combines several univariate community metrics into an aggregate index and is directly applicable to management because it is used in Maryland to classify streams according to biological condition (Klauda et al 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in elemental composition between resource and consumer can limit consumer productivity and provides important selection pressure to promote species diversity in streams , Evans-White et al 2009). Some investigators have explored the effects of variable water-column nutrient availability on leaflitter-associated microbial biomass and decomposition Suberkropp 2003, Baldy et al 2007) and of detrital stoichiometry on the trophic response of invertebrates (Hladyz et al 2009, Small et al 2011, but broad assumptions often are made concerning the chemical alterations in the basal food resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination of multiple community ecology theories would certainly improve our understanding of community stoichiometry, since competition theory alone does not explain the high biodiversity found in, for example, phytoplankton communities (Passarge et al, 2006). Species diversity is a factor that has received special interest recently, both as a factor affecting (Striebel et al, 2009;Abbas et al, 2013) and being affected by stoichiometry (Evans-White et al, 2009;Lewandowska et al, 2016). The study by Guiz et al (2016) is unique in its attempts at causally explaining both the mean and variation in stoichiometry within local communities and suggests an intriguing convergence in the mean and variance of C:N ratios between plant communities established on different soil fertilities.…”
Section: Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%