2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thresholds in natural resource rents and state owned enterprise profitability: Cross country evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We further divide the sample into state-owned (R4) and non-state owned (R5) to test whether the ownership of enterprises buffers or intensifies the impact of water risk. Some scholars believe that state-owned enterprises can strengthen their profitability through natural resources rent [ 86 ]. However, other scholars hold the opposite opinions, in that as state-owned enterprises function as an instrument to enforce government policies, they may underperform in financial outcomes to reach non-commercial goals [ 87 , 88 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further divide the sample into state-owned (R4) and non-state owned (R5) to test whether the ownership of enterprises buffers or intensifies the impact of water risk. Some scholars believe that state-owned enterprises can strengthen their profitability through natural resources rent [ 86 ]. However, other scholars hold the opposite opinions, in that as state-owned enterprises function as an instrument to enforce government policies, they may underperform in financial outcomes to reach non-commercial goals [ 87 , 88 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firm size is measured by the number of employees. Due to the stronger connection with local government, SOEs tend to achieve better economic performances than non-SOEs in resource-intensive industries [ 40 ]. Ownership is characterized by the type of registration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Вопрос существования абсолютной горной ренты прак тически не рассматривается в экономической литературе, поскольку отношения недропользования несколько отли чаются от других форм рентных отношений. Главное отли чие кроется в том, что собственником природных ресур сов является не частник, а государство [11,12,13]. В систе ме частной собственности абсолютная рента обеспечива ет механизм закрепления и воспроизводства сложивших ся отношений присвоения природных благ.…”
Section: заключениеunclassified