The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Thrombolytic agents for arterial and venous thromboses in neonates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach to the management of PVT in neonates is not standardized because of the absence of solid evidence with regard to the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy and current reports of favorable outcomes based on conservative management. Therefore, a majority of healthcare providers err on the side of caution and assume a watch‐and‐wait approach because treatment needs to be judiciously weighed in terms of benefit versus risk of causing harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach to the management of PVT in neonates is not standardized because of the absence of solid evidence with regard to the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy and current reports of favorable outcomes based on conservative management. Therefore, a majority of healthcare providers err on the side of caution and assume a watch‐and‐wait approach because treatment needs to be judiciously weighed in terms of benefit versus risk of causing harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several procoagulants, anticoagulants, and proteins involved in the fibrinolytic pathway are gestational age dependent, and factor levels are approximately 50% of the adult values at birth but steadily mature beyond 6 months of age. 31 The approach to the management of PVT in neonates is not standardized because of the absence of solid evidence with regard to the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy 34,35 and current reports of favorable outcomes based on conservative management. Therefore, a majority of healthcare providers err on the side of caution and assume a watch-and-wait approach because treatment needs to be judiciously weighed in terms of benefit versus risk of causing harm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review provided no conclusions about the most appropriate treatment, as no eligible studies were found. 8 It is generally acknowledged that there is urgent need for large multicentre studies on which to base recommendations. Treatment options include anticoagulant treatment with heparin or LMWH, thrombolytic treatment or surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 36 Treatment recommendations are uncertain therefore until there are randomised controlled trials of thrombolytic treatment for RVT, as recently advocated for all forms of thrombosis in infancy. 37 …”
Section: Prothrombotic Tendenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%