2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-003-0216-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throughfall Nitrogen Deposition Has Different Impacts on Soil Solution Nitrate Concentration in European Coniferous and Deciduous Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
86
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
86
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower N fluxes in throughfall compared to bulk precipitation also indicate that dry deposition of inorganic N compounds on foliage, in the form of gases or aerosols, is probably quite low in our study site. In many European temperate broadleaved forests, throughfall fluxes exceed bulk precipitation fluxes due to the wash-off of dry-deposited compounds (e.g., Kristensen et al 2004;Thimonier et al 2005), even though N is most likely taken up by the canopy as well (Harrison et al 2000). The strongly enhanced throughfall K + concentrations and fluxes that we observed at our beech stands is also well documented in the literature for tree canopies (Stachurski and Zimka 2002).…”
Section: General Effect Of the Tree Canopy On Precipitation Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The lower N fluxes in throughfall compared to bulk precipitation also indicate that dry deposition of inorganic N compounds on foliage, in the form of gases or aerosols, is probably quite low in our study site. In many European temperate broadleaved forests, throughfall fluxes exceed bulk precipitation fluxes due to the wash-off of dry-deposited compounds (e.g., Kristensen et al 2004;Thimonier et al 2005), even though N is most likely taken up by the canopy as well (Harrison et al 2000). The strongly enhanced throughfall K + concentrations and fluxes that we observed at our beech stands is also well documented in the literature for tree canopies (Stachurski and Zimka 2002).…”
Section: General Effect Of the Tree Canopy On Precipitation Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Precipitation DIN input was estimated at 31.6 and 34.2 kg N ha −1 yr −1 in the two years studied (Table 2), which are comparable to the highest deposition levels observed in Europe (MacDonald et al, 2002;Kristensen et al, 2004), but higher than those observed in most forests in North America (Fenn et al, 1998;Campbell et al, 2004) and Japan (Ohte et al, 2001). Precipitation DIN deposition at our site is higher than some other parts of southern China as well (Gan et al, 1995;Chen et al, 1997;Sha et al, 2002;Chen and Mulder, 2007a), except in Zhangzhou of Fujiang Province and Shanghai where average deposition of 37 and 58 kg N ha −1 yr −1 in precipitation were reported (Xiao et al, 2005;Zhang, 2006).…”
Section: Wet N Depositionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…, which was more than twice the wet N deposition in Europe (Kristensen et al, 2004). Consequently, the magnitude of N deposition in this study could underestimate the total N deposition, due to the missing DON deposition and dry N deposition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%