Ieee Infocom 2004
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2004.1354518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks

Abstract: , whereis the velocity of the mobile nodes. We then describe a scheme that achieves the optimal order of delay for any given throughput. The scheme varies (i) the number of hops, (ii) the transmission range and (iii) the degree of node mobility to achieve the optimal throughput-delay trade-off. The scheme produces a range of models that capture the Gupta-Kumar model at one extreme and the Grossglauser-Tse model at the other. In the course of our work, we recover previous results of Gupta and Kumar, and Grossgl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
540
1
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(551 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
9
540
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results conclude that the network throughput will approach zero with an increasing n. This conclusion was further elaborated and verified in a series of follow-up papers [8][9][10][11]. More sophisticated models were also developed to incorporate node mobility or fading [12][13][14][15][16][17] --they were obviously inspired by this rather pessimistic result and aimed at improving the network throughput. As mentioned earlier, the input rate λ and the SD distance L are intrinsic elements affecting the network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These results conclude that the network throughput will approach zero with an increasing n. This conclusion was further elaborated and verified in a series of follow-up papers [8][9][10][11]. More sophisticated models were also developed to incorporate node mobility or fading [12][13][14][15][16][17] --they were obviously inspired by this rather pessimistic result and aimed at improving the network throughput. As mentioned earlier, the input rate λ and the SD distance L are intrinsic elements affecting the network throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Gamal et al [32] did great work in characterizing the delay and determining the throughput-delay trade-off in fixed and mobile ad hoc networks. They use cell area to parameterize the trade-off and figure out the optimal throughput-delay tradeoff.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sharp transition is presented by the uniform distribution, which annihilates the node isolation probability for λ > 2 m −1 . The 6 Node isolation probability vs. average node density, R = 1 m for various node placement statistics Springer normal distribution (which corresponds to the case of nodes placed one after the other, the distance being deterministic in principle but affected by a Gaussian placement error), on the other hand, behaves poorly in the medium density regime, while showing very good performance in a very dense network. In order to better understand the performance in very dense networks, let us consider the following heuristic.…”
Section: Coverage and Isolation Probabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing interest in the field of self-organizing wireless networks, often referred to as ad hoc, has led to a considerable amount of literature dealing with the characterization of the limiting performance of such networks, in terms of both connectivity [1][2][3][4] and capacity [5][6][7][8][9][10], two intimately related issues [11]. In this paper, we focus on one-dimensional ad hoc networks, in which nodes are randomly deployed over an infinite line, and present novel results on connectivity and coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%