2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0043887110000043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Throwing out the Bums: Protest Voting and Unorthodox Parties after Communism

Abstract: The electoral rise of unorthodox parties (UOPs) in recent East European elections raises some puzzling questions about electoral dynamics in new democracies. Why did the power alternation of the mid-1990s not result in party-system consolidation, as suggested by some earlier studies, but instead give way to a much more chaotic environment in which established mainstream political parties lost considerable ground to new political formations based on personalist and populist appeals? Why did this reversal in Eas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
102
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
102
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The term CPP has been used to capture the unusual identity of these new political parties based solely on populist appeals. In his analysis of party politics in post‐communist Europe, Grigore Pop‐Eleches () defined new/centrist populism as one of the four types of unorthodox parties. New/centrist populist parties do not present a radical ideology.…”
Section: Centrist Populism – the Concept And The Czech Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term CPP has been used to capture the unusual identity of these new political parties based solely on populist appeals. In his analysis of party politics in post‐communist Europe, Grigore Pop‐Eleches () defined new/centrist populism as one of the four types of unorthodox parties. New/centrist populist parties do not present a radical ideology.…”
Section: Centrist Populism – the Concept And The Czech Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their programmes are based on the claim that they fight the corrupt elite and pursue the interests of the people, promising to enhance living standards. As Pop‐Eleches states (: 231), “such parties are almost completely unencumbered by ideological constraints and are therefore free to tell the voters what they want to hear” . Similarly, Peter Učeň () used the term centrist populism to describe political parties that entered the Slovak parliament in the 1998 and 2002 general elections.…”
Section: Centrist Populism – the Concept And The Czech Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, party competition based on ideological grounds has emerged (Kitschelt et al, 1999;Rohrschneider and Whitefield, 2012;Rovny and Polk, 2015) and at least some parties established relatively strong party organizations (Gherghina, 2014;Ibenskas, 2014a;Tavits, 2013). On the other hand, the strength of membership organizations remains weaker in Central and Eastern Europe than in Western Europe (Van Biezen, Mair and Poguntke, 2012), the level of party organizational change is higher (Marinova, 2015), and all countries in the region continue to experience high levels of new party entry, including the emergence of centrist parties with fuzzy ideologies (Bågenholm, 2013;Hanley and Sikk, 2014;Pop-Eleches, 2010;Sikk, 2012).…”
Section: Intra-party and Inter-party Conflict And Cooperation In New mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first mayoral and city council elec tions were held in 1999 and 2003, respectively, and the first nationwide local elections were held in 2005. 6 Blaydes 2011Corstange 2012;Lust-Okar 2006;Magaloni 2006;Pop-Eleches 2010;Tucker 2002. ine why this pattern exists in the context of legislative elections in a nondemocratic setting. 5 Goldberg, Wibbels, andMvukiyehe 2008;Monteiro and Ferraz 2010;Ross 2012.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%