2015
DOI: 10.1002/2014je004755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tides on the Moon: Theory and determination of dissipation

Abstract: Solid body tides on the Moon vary by about ±0.1 m each month. In addition to changes in shape, the Moon's gravity field and orientation in space are affected by tides. The tidal expressions for an elastic sphere are compact, but dissipation introduces modifications that depend on the forcing period. Consequently, a Fourier representation of the tide-raising potential is needed. A mathematical model for the distortion-caused tidal potential may be used for the analysis of precise spacecraft tracking data. Since… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
190
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(176 reference statements)
2
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple model of solid Moon tides was used in this work, while more detailed models have been recently developed; see (Williams and Boggs 2015).…”
Section: Reductions Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple model of solid Moon tides was used in this work, while more detailed models have been recently developed; see (Williams and Boggs 2015).…”
Section: Reductions Of Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMB flattening, ε f , is poorly constrained by lunar laser ranging observations [e.g., Williams and Boggs , ], but it is probable that it is also in a state of hydrostatic equilibrium given the high temperatures deep in the Moon. Assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, and adapting the methodology presented in Veasey and Dumberry [], ε f can be expressed in terms of ε r , ε m and ε s , εf=kfrεr+kfmεm+kfsεs0.3em, where kfr=ρcscriptP0.3em,14.22636ptkfm=ρmρcscriptP0.3em,14.22636ptkfs=()rsrf5()ρsρfscriptP0.3em, scriptP=ρm+23ρf+53()rsrf3()ρsρf0.3em. …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even assuming a lower than current tidal quality factor Q = 100 for the Moon during the in the interior at the time of the transition, its Love number would be higher than it is now, again leading to more rapid inclination damping. Third, we assumed constant tidal properties for Earth throughout the calculation, which is in conflict with the fact that the current rate of the Moon's tidal recession is about three times higher than the long-term average 35 . An increase in the tidal dissipation within Earth's oceans over time as suggested by modeling 36,37 would mean that the Moon spent more time at the Cassini state transition than we calculated, allowing more damping of inclination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%