Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68111-3_112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tightness Results for Malleable Task Scheduling Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24]). -One may also consider malleable jobs which can be assigned several machines and the actual processing time depends on the number of machines allocated (see e.g., [20], [24]). …”
Section: Summary Extensions and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24]). -One may also consider malleable jobs which can be assigned several machines and the actual processing time depends on the number of machines allocated (see e.g., [20], [24]). …”
Section: Summary Extensions and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our problem, the cost of scheduling each of the jobs depends on the other jobs scheduled on the same machine in the corresponding time interval; thus, it may change over time and among different machines. Scheduling moldable jobs, where each job can have varying processing times, depending on the amount of resources allotted to this job, has been studied using classic measures, such as minimum makespan, or minimum (weighted) sum of completion times (see, e.g., [20,15] and a comprehensive survey in [19]). …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• One may also consider malleable jobs which can be assigned several machines and the actual processing time depends on the number of machines allocated (see e.g., [23,30]). …”
Section: Summary and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%