2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.04507
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TiKick: Towards Playing Multi-agent Football Full Games from Single-agent Demonstrations

Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has achieved super-human performance on complex video games (e.g., StarCraft II and Dota II). However, current DRL systems still suffer from challenges of multi-agent coordination, sparse rewards, stochastic environments, etc. In seeking to address these challenges, we employ a football video game, e.g., Google Research Football (GRF), as our testbed and develop an end-to-end learning-based AI system (denoted as TiKick 23 ) to complete this challenging task. In this work, we f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model of Tikick is released and our evaluation result of Tikick is consistent with the paper [15]. The results are shown in Figure 5, where FXP achieves the largest goal difference against all reference policies.…”
Section: Google Research Footballsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The model of Tikick is released and our evaluation result of Tikick is consistent with the paper [15]. The results are shown in Figure 5, where FXP achieves the largest goal difference against all reference policies.…”
Section: Google Research Footballsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Finally, with large-scale training, we use FXP to solve the challenging 11-vs-11 multi-agent full game in Google Research Football (GRF) [17]. We compare our methods with SOTA models including the hardest built-in AI, PSRO w. BD&RD [20] agent, and Tikick agent [15]. FXP achieves over 94% win rate against available models with a significant goal difference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations