1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(96)01080-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage-induced soil carbon dioxide loss from different cropping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

23
112
2
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
23
112
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were consistent with those of other reports that SCE increased by 2-15 times after tillage (Reicosky et al 1997;Calderon et al 2001;Reicosky 2002;Morris et al 2004;La Scala et al 2005;Gesch et al 2007;Alvaro-Fuentes et al 2007). Reicosky et al (1997) found that the increase in SCE seen immediately after tillage was the result of a physical release of CO 2 entrapped in soil pores rather than changes in microbial activity at the time of tillage. Although the burst immediately following tillage in 2006 and 2007 might be partly explained by physical release of the CO 2 , this physical process could not explain the sustained long-term increase in SCE observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results were consistent with those of other reports that SCE increased by 2-15 times after tillage (Reicosky et al 1997;Calderon et al 2001;Reicosky 2002;Morris et al 2004;La Scala et al 2005;Gesch et al 2007;Alvaro-Fuentes et al 2007). Reicosky et al (1997) found that the increase in SCE seen immediately after tillage was the result of a physical release of CO 2 entrapped in soil pores rather than changes in microbial activity at the time of tillage. Although the burst immediately following tillage in 2006 and 2007 might be partly explained by physical release of the CO 2 , this physical process could not explain the sustained long-term increase in SCE observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The SCE peaks occurring after tillage might have been due to the fact that (1) tillage incorporates residue into soil, increases microbial substrates and stimulates mineralization of soil organic materials (Alvarez et al 2001;Zhang et al 2011); (2) tillage improves soil aeration and increases contact between soil and crop residues (Alvaro-Fuentes et al 2007); and (3) tillage disrupts soil aggregates and exposes aggregate-protected organic matter to microbial attack (Beare et al 1994;Kristensen et al 2000;Kladivko 2001). Our results were consistent with those of other reports that SCE increased by 2-15 times after tillage (Reicosky et al 1997;Calderon et al 2001;Reicosky 2002;Morris et al 2004;La Scala et al 2005;Gesch et al 2007;Alvaro-Fuentes et al 2007). Reicosky et al (1997) found that the increase in SCE seen immediately after tillage was the result of a physical release of CO 2 entrapped in soil pores rather than changes in microbial activity at the time of tillage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On this date, no-tillage had 47 % greater soil surface CO 2 flux than that under conventional tillage, with respective readings of 1.07 and 0.73 μmol CO 2 m −2 s −1 . Results from this sampling date are different from what was expected based on past studies that reported greater CO 2 flux under conventional tillage than that measured under reduced and no-tillage treatments (Reicosky and Lindstrom 1993;Reicosky et al 1997;West and Marland 2002). These results were also contrary to results in a study evaluating a soybean-wheat rotation on a silt-loam soil in a similar geographic location of east-central Arkansas, which reported a 38 % greater soil surface CO 2 flux under conventional tillage than from that under no-tillage (Brye et al 2006b).…”
Section: Tillage Effects On Soil Surface Co 2 Fluxcontrasting
confidence: 99%